2LK111 part Development, Spring 2025 studyperiod 1

Respondents: 9
Answer Count: 8
Answer Frequency: 88.89%

My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.

My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (25.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (37.5%)
To a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.	3.9	1.2	32.2 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.

I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	2 (25.0%)
To a large extent	3 (37.5%)
To a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.	4.1	0.8	20.2 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	5.0	5.0

The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.

The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (12.5%)
To some extent	3 (37.5%)
To a large extent	2 (25.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.	3.6	1.1	29.3 %	2.0	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0

The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.

The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	4 (50.0%)
To a large extent	2 (25.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.	3.8	0.9	23.6 %	3.0	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0

I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.

I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (25.0%)
To some extent	3 (37.5%)
To a large extent	1 (12.5%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.	3.4	1.2	35.2 %	2.0	2.5	3.0	4.5	5.0

The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.

The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (12.5%)
To a large extent	3 (37.5%)
To a very large extent	4 (50.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.	4.4	0.7	17.0 %	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.

I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (12.5%)
To a large extent	5 (62.5%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.	4.1	0.6	15.5 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.

The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (12.5%)
To a large extent	5 (62.5%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.	4.1	0.6	15.5 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.

The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	5 (62.5%)
To a very large extent	1 (12.5%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	2 (25.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.	4.6	0.9	19.8 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.5	6.0

What is your overall assessment of Part Development?

What is your overall assessment of Part Development?	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (12.5%)
good	3 (37.5%)
very good	4 (50.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
What is your overall assessment of Part Development?	4.4	0.7	17.0 %	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

The quiz was relevant to the course learning objectives.

The quiz was relevant to the course learning objectives.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (12.5%)
To a large extent	4 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The quiz was relevant to the course learning objectives.	4.2	0.7	16.6 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.

I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (37.5%)
To a very large extent	5 (62.5%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.	4.6	0.5	11.2 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The seminars were a support in my learning process during Part Development?

Pediatric physical examination

Pediatric physical examination	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	2 (25.0%)
to a large extent	2 (25.0%)
to a very large extent	4 (50.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Pediatric physical examination	4.2	0.9	20.9 %	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0	5.0

Child Psychiatry, BUP seminars

Child Psychiatry, BUP seminars	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	2 (25.0%)
to some extent	3 (37.5%)
to a large extent	2 (25.0%)
to a very large extent	1 (12.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Child Psychiatry, BUP seminars	3.2	1.0	31.8 %	2.0	2.5	3.0	4.0	5.0

Neurology seminar

Neurology seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (12.5%)
to some extent	3 (37.5%)
to a large extent	2 (25.0%)
to a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Neurology seminar	3.6	1.1	29.3 %	2.0	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0

Emergency & general pediatrics seminar

Emergency & general pediatrics seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	2 (25.0%)
to a large extent	2 (25.0%)
to a very large extent	4 (50.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Emergency & general pediatrics seminar	4.2	0.9	20.9 %	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0	5.0

Infection seminar

Infection seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	4 (50.0%)
to a large extent	1 (12.5%)
to a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Infection seminar	3.9	1.0	25.6 %	3.0	3.0	3.5	5.0	5.0

Astma / Allergy seminar

Astma / Allergy seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (12.5%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	4 (50.0%)
to a large extent	0 (0.0%)
to a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Astma / Allergy seminar	3.5	1.4	40.4 %	1.0	3.0	3.0	5.0	5.0

Endocrine seminar

Endocrine seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (12.5%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	3 (37.5%)
to a very large extent	4 (50.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Endocrine seminar	4.2	1.0	24.4 %	2.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

Diabetes seminar

Diabetes seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (12.5%)
to some extent	2 (25.0%)
to a large extent	1 (12.5%)
to a very large extent	4 (50.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Diabetes seminar	4.0	1.2	29.9 %	2.0	3.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

Gastroenterology seminar

Gastroenterology seminar	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (12.5%)
to some extent	3 (37.5%)
to a large extent	1 (12.5%)
to a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Gastroenterology seminar	3.8	1.2	31.1 %	2.0	3.0	3.5	5.0	5.0

Questions on clinical rotation (VFU)

During clinical rotation (VFU) , I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.

During clinical rotation (VFU) , I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	2 (25.0%)
To a large extent	4 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation (VFU) , I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.	4.0	0.8	18.9 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	4.5	5.0

During clinical rotation (VFU) , the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).

During clinical rotation (VFU) , the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	1 (12.5%)
To a very large extent	7 (87.5%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation (VFU) , the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).	4.9	0.4	7.3 %	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

During clinical rotation (VFU) , I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.

During clinical rotation (VFU) , I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (12.5%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	0 (0.0%)
To a very large extent	6 (75.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	1 (12.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation (VFU) , I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.	4.6	1.1	24.8 %	2.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.

The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	2 (25.0%)
To a large extent	1 (12.5%)
To a very large extent	5 (62.5%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.	4.4	0.9	20.9 %	3.0	3.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

I took part in relevant activities during my placements.

I took part in relevant activities during my placements.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (25.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (37.5%)
To a very large extent	2 (25.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	1 (12.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I took part in relevant activities during my placements.	3.7	1.3	33.7 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

I was appointed a supervisor during my placement.

I was appointed a supervisor during my placement.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (12.5%)
To a large extent	4 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I was appointed a supervisor during my placement.	4.2	0.7	16.6 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the placement.

My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the placement.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (12.5%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	4 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (37.5%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the placement.	4.1	1.0	24.0 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Have you had the opportunity to perform a pediatric examination independently?

Have you had the opportunity to perform a pediatric examination independently?	Number of responses
No	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at one to three occasions	2 (25.0%)
Yes, at four to six occasions	2 (25.0%)
Yes, at seven to ten occasions	2 (25.0%)
Yes, at more than ten occasions	2 (25.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you had the opportunity to perform a pediatric examination independently?	3.5	1.2	34.1 %	2.0	2.5	3.5	4.5	5.0

How do you value the clinical rotation during Part Development?

Pediatric surgery

Pediatric surgery	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	4 (50.0%)
good	4 (50.0%)
very good	0 (0.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Pediatric surgery	3.5	0.5	15.3 %	3.0	3.0	3.5	4.0	4.0

Maternity ward (BB) Solna

Maternity ward (BB) Solna	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	2 (40.0%)
very good	2 (40.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Maternity ward (BB) Solna	4.2	0.8	19.9 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Maternity ward (BB) Danderyd

Maternity ward (BB) Danderyd	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Maternity ward (BB) Danderyd	4.4	0.9	20.3 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Neonatology Solna

Neonatology Solna	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	2 (40.0%)
very good	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Neonatology Solna	3.6	1.1	31.7 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Neonatology Danderyd

Neonatology Danderyd	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (40.0%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Neonatology Danderyd	4.2	1.1	26.1 %	3.0	3.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

ER Student outpatient clinic (KUM)

ER Student outpatient clinic (KUM)	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	2 (25.0%)
very good	6 (75.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
ER Student outpatient clinic (KUM)	4.8	0.5	9.7 %	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

Endocrine

Endocrine	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (12.5%)
neither bad nor good	2 (25.0%)
good	3 (37.5%)
very good	2 (25.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Endocrine	3.8	1.0	27.6 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

Infection ward

Infection ward	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	3 (60.0%)
very good	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Infection ward	3.8	1.1	28.8 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Neuro ward

Neuro ward	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	3 (60.0%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Neuro ward	3.2	1.1	34.2 %	2.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	5.0

CPR

CPR	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (12.5%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	7 (87.5%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
CPR	4.8	0.7	14.9 %	3.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

IPL

IPL	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (12.5%)
good	3 (37.5%)
very good	4 (50.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
IPL	4.4	0.7	17.0 %	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

Sollentuna BUMM Martina (Community Pediatrician's office)

Sollentuna BUMM Martina (Community Pediatrician's office)	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	2 (25.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (25.0%)
good	2 (25.0%)
very good	2 (25.0%)
Total	8 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Sollentuna BUMM Martina (Community Pediatrician's office)	3.5	1.2	34.1 %	2.0	2.5	3.5	4.5	5.0

Täby BUMM (Community Pediatrician's office)

Täby BUMM (Community Pediatrician's office)	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (66.7%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	1 (33.3%)
Total	3 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Täby BUMM (Community Pediatrician's office)	3.7	1.2	31.5 %	3.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

Have you, during any clinical rotation (VFU) in the course, been trained on how to:

Have you, during any clinical rotation (VFU) in the course, been trained on how to:	Number of responses
· Prescribe medication	1 (33.3%)
· Prescribe intravenous infusion	1 (33.3%)
· Prescribe medication (in a prescription module in Take Care)	0 (0.0%)
· Provide oral medication orders to nurses	2 (66.7%)
Total	4 (133.3%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you, during any clinical rotation (VFU) in the course, been trained on how to:	2.8	1.5	54.5 %	1.0	1.5	3.0	4.0	4.0

Thank you for your feedback!