Clinical Immunology in Infectious Diseases
Respondents: 18
Answer Count: 15
Answer Frequency: 83.33%
The level of the course correlates with the description of the course.
| The level of the course correlates with the description of the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 7 (46.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 7 (46.7%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The level of the course correlates with the description of the course. | 5.2 | 1.3 | 24.3 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained.
| The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 6 (40.0%) | |
| Strongly agree | 7 (46.7%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained. | 5.1 | 1.3 | 25.4 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course.
| There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 5 (33.3%) | |
| Strongly agree | 8 (53.3%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course. | 5.2 | 1.3 | 25.4 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes.
| The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 2 (13.3%) | |
| 6 (40.0%) | |
| Strongly agree | 6 (40.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes. | 5.0 | 1.3 | 26.2 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge.
| The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 4 (26.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 9 (60.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge. | 5.3 | 1.3 | 25.3 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I achieved the intended learning outcomes.
| I achieved the intended learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 9 (60.0%) | |
| Strongly agree | 5 (33.3%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I achieved the intended learning outcomes. | 5.1 | 1.2 | 24.1 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way.
| The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 4 (26.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 10 (66.7%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way. | 5.4 | 1.3 | 24.0 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was:
| How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was: | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 8 (53.3%) | |
| 5 (33.3%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| Too high | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was: | 4.4 | 0.7 | 16.7 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
I have received relevant feedback during the course.
| I have received relevant feedback during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 6 (40.0%) | |
| Strongly agree | 7 (46.7%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I have received relevant feedback during the course. | 5.1 | 1.3 | 25.4 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality.
| This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 5 (33.3%) | |
| Strongly agree | 8 (53.3%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality. | 5.2 | 1.3 | 25.4 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I was highly motivated in taking this course.
| I was highly motivated in taking this course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 2 (13.3%) | |
| 4 (26.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 8 (53.3%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I was highly motivated in taking this course. | 5.2 | 1.1 | 22.0 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I had sufficient prior knowledge to be able to fully participate in the course.
| I had sufficient prior knowledge to be able to fully participate in the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 2 (13.3%) | |
| 2 (13.3%) | |
| 4 (26.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 6 (40.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I had sufficient prior knowledge to be able to fully participate in the course. | 4.7 | 1.5 | 31.4 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I have contributed to and engaged in the course.
| I have contributed to and engaged in the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 1 (6.7%) |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 2 (13.3%) | |
| 8 (53.3%) | |
| Strongly agree | 4 (26.7%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I have contributed to and engaged in the course. | 4.9 | 1.2 | 25.6 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 |
The course has increased my knowledge of recent advances within my field, in related areas or in general science subjects.
| The course has increased my knowledge of recent advances within my field, in related areas or in general science subjects. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 5 (33.3%) | |
| Strongly agree | 8 (53.3%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course has increased my knowledge of recent advances within my field, in related areas or in general science subjects. | 5.3 | 1.1 | 20.9 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course has increased my understanding of relevant research methodologies and techniques and their appropriate application within my research field.
| The course has increased my understanding of relevant research methodologies and techniques and their appropriate application within my research field. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 0 (0.0%) | |
| 4 (26.7%) | |
| 4 (26.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 6 (40.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course has increased my understanding of relevant research methodologies and techniques and their appropriate application within my research field. | 4.9 | 1.2 | 23.6 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course has increased my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings.
| The course has increased my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | |
| 2 (13.3%) | |
| 7 (46.7%) | |
| Strongly agree | 4 (26.7%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course has increased my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings. | 4.8 | 1.1 | 23.9 % | 2.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 |
Are there any parts of the course that have been excellent? Please describe in what way.
| Are there any parts of the course that have been excellent? Please describe in what way. |
|---|
| The course was very interactive with lively dicussions and lectures. The organizers were very helpful and keen to give feedback. Excellent group of participants and fantastic organizers |
| The project writing and oral presentation are very good. It is very good to get trained. |
| the speakers were very good, it was nice to have them break their research down into more fundamental terms to help understand things better |
| The group discussions - allow change of perspective on questions and problems. |
| Staph aureus infections |
| All the lectures by the clinicians were very informative and helped obtain a better understanding of the clinical aspects of infectious disease immunology. |
| Most of it |
Are there any parts of the course that did not help you to achieve the intended learning outcomes? Please describe why not?
| Are there any parts of the course that did not help you to achieve the intended learning outcomes? Please describe why not? |
|---|
| None |
| No |
| - |
| None |
| No. |
| I think the lecture system is good, but it can get too tiresome in a two weeks course. One of the teachers try a system where we discussed a paper and later we got feedback on the immunological aspects and that was great |
Did the course cover the areas that you expected? If not what was missing?
| Did the course cover the areas that you expected? If not what was missing? |
|---|
| Everything was covered and up to date |
| Yes |
| yes |
| Yes |
| Yes |
| Yes. But a majority of the participants were from a clinical background, and I felt some of them were less familiar with a few concepts. A few more talks, giving a more comprehensive background in immunology might be helpful. |
| Yes, it did. |
Do you have any recommendations as to how the course could be further improved?
| Do you have any recommendations as to how the course could be further improved? |
|---|
| Keep it up as interactive with discussions and questions as much as possible. |
| It would be better if each speaker could recommend several classical and useful papers related to the talk afterward. |
| I think at times it was a little bit too clinical focused, although many of the students were physicians this may have skewed things. I think it would be helpful to keep it a little more research based since this is a course for PhD students |
| The project plans should not be rushed. The participants perspective on the "project" plans is very interesting and valuable for my research. I believe that we could all benefit from been given more time to question and analyse the project plans. Most of us work with new methodology for investigating our hypothesis, next year, perhaps the participants could explain one the most crucial methods used in their research - allowing others to see if that methodology may be suitable for additional projects. |
| None |
| May be have one more lecture per day? It might cut down total course duration. |
| See 18 |
I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education.
| I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Yes | 15 (100.0%) |
| No | 0 (0.0%) |
| Not applicable | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education. | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
In what capacity did you attend this course?
| In what capacity did you attend this course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Doctoral student at KI or KI partner university | 13 (86.7%) |
| Doctoral student at another university in Sweden | 1 (6.7%) |
| Doctoral student at another university outside Sweden | 1 (6.7%) |
| Postdoc at KI | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 15 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In what capacity did you attend this course? | 1.2 | 0.6 | 46.7 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 |