HT23 General and Organic Chemistry
Respondents: 61
Answer Count: 41
Answer Frequency: 67.21%
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 11 (26.8%) |
| to a large extent | 21 (51.2%) |
| to a very large extent | 9 (22.0%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | 4.0 | 0.7 | 17.9 % | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 6 (14.6%) |
| to some extent | 13 (31.7%) |
| to a large extent | 17 (41.5%) |
| to a very large extent | 5 (12.2%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | 3.5 | 0.9 | 25.6 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 6 (14.6%) |
| to a large extent | 20 (48.8%) |
| to a very large extent | 15 (36.6%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | 4.2 | 0.7 | 16.3 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.9%) |
| to some extent | 11 (26.8%) |
| to a large extent | 16 (39.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 12 (29.3%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | 3.9 | 0.9 | 22.3 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.9%) |
| to a small extent | 1 (2.4%) |
| to some extent | 16 (39.0%) |
| to a large extent | 15 (36.6%) |
| to a very large extent | 7 (17.1%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | 3.6 | 1.0 | 27.2 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded?
| To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| To a very small extent | 5 (12.2%) |
| To a small extent | 10 (24.4%) |
| To some extent | 11 (26.8%) |
| To a large extent | 11 (26.8%) |
| To a very large extent | 4 (9.8%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded? | 3.0 | 1.2 | 40.1 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 1 (2.4%) |
| to some extent | 11 (26.8%) |
| to a large extent | 21 (51.2%) |
| to a very large extent | 8 (19.5%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 3.9 | 0.7 | 19.3 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 1 (2.5%) |
| to some extent | 5 (12.5%) |
| to a large extent | 21 (52.5%) |
| to a very large extent | 13 (32.5%) |
| Total | 40 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.2 | 0.7 | 17.7 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 8 (19.5%) |
| to a large extent | 15 (36.6%) |
| to a very large extent | 18 (43.9%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | 4.2 | 0.8 | 18.1 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.4%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.9%) |
| to some extent | 12 (29.3%) |
| to a large extent | 17 (41.5%) |
| to a very large extent | 9 (22.0%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 3.8 | 0.9 | 25.1 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 3 (7.3%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.9%) |
| to some extent | 14 (34.1%) |
| to a large extent | 15 (36.6%) |
| to a very large extent | 7 (17.1%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | 3.5 | 1.1 | 30.6 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
What is your overall opinion of the course?
| What is your overall opinion of the course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 2 (4.9%) |
| OK | 13 (31.7%) |
| good | 13 (31.7%) |
| very good | 13 (31.7%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is your overall opinion of the course? | 3.9 | 0.9 | 23.5 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Rate the following teaching modules
Lecture
| Lecture | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.4%) |
| poor | 6 (14.6%) |
| OK | 14 (34.1%) |
| good | 15 (36.6%) |
| very good | 5 (12.2%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture | 3.4 | 1.0 | 28.5 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Seminar
| Seminar | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.4%) |
| poor | 5 (12.2%) |
| OK | 5 (12.2%) |
| good | 14 (34.1%) |
| very good | 16 (39.0%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar | 4.0 | 1.1 | 28.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Self-Study
| Self-Study | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.5%) |
| poor | 4 (10.0%) |
| OK | 14 (35.0%) |
| good | 16 (40.0%) |
| very good | 5 (12.5%) |
| Total | 40 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Study | 3.5 | 0.9 | 26.7 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Labs
| Labs | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 3 (7.3%) |
| good | 21 (51.2%) |
| very good | 17 (41.5%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labs | 4.3 | 0.6 | 14.2 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Intermediate Test
| Intermediate Test | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.5%) |
| poor | 1 (2.5%) |
| OK | 5 (12.5%) |
| good | 16 (40.0%) |
| very good | 17 (42.5%) |
| Total | 40 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermediate Test | 4.2 | 0.9 | 22.3 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Final Exam
| Final Exam | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.4%) |
| poor | 1 (2.4%) |
| OK | 9 (22.0%) |
| good | 20 (48.8%) |
| very good | 10 (24.4%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Exam | 3.9 | 0.9 | 22.8 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
For the entire course rate the attitude of the people (staff) you have been in contact with the MBB on the course.
Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp)
| Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 2 (4.9%) |
| OK | 1 (2.4%) |
| good | 11 (26.8%) |
| very good | 27 (65.9%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp) | 4.5 | 0.8 | 17.1 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lecturers
| Lecturers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.4%) |
| OK | 11 (26.8%) |
| good | 21 (51.2%) |
| very good | 8 (19.5%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecturers | 3.9 | 0.7 | 19.3 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Seminar teachers
| Seminar teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 6 (14.6%) |
| OK | 3 (7.3%) |
| good | 19 (46.3%) |
| very good | 13 (31.7%) |
| Total | 41 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar teachers | 4.0 | 1.0 | 25.3 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Self-Study help teachers
| Self-Study help teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 3 (7.5%) |
| OK | 9 (22.5%) |
| good | 14 (35.0%) |
| very good | 14 (35.0%) |
| Total | 40 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Study help teachers | 4.0 | 0.9 | 23.8 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lab teachers
| Lab teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.5%) |
| poor | 1 (2.5%) |
| OK | 4 (10.0%) |
| good | 19 (47.5%) |
| very good | 15 (37.5%) |
| Total | 40 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lab teachers | 4.2 | 0.9 | 21.5 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury)
| Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 7 (19.4%) |
| good | 12 (33.3%) |
| very good | 17 (47.2%) |
| Total | 36 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury) | 4.3 | 0.8 | 18.2 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Course lab (Michaela Mårback & Annika Olsson)
| Course lab (Michaela Mårback & Annika Olsson) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 5 (13.5%) |
| good | 13 (35.1%) |
| very good | 19 (51.4%) |
| Total | 37 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course lab (Michaela Mårback & Annika Olsson) | 4.4 | 0.7 | 16.5 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Which self-study/seminar type(s) do you feel is/are most suited to your learning?
| Which self-study/seminar type(s) do you feel is/are most suited to your learning? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Self-Study (no preparation; work with lecture material and/or set questions; teacher available for help) | 12 (30.0%) |
| Seminar (prepare answers before; discuss questions/answer with teacher and peers) | 15 (37.5%) |
| Mixed self-study/seminar (preparation voluntary; work on questions in groups, groups present answers; teacher to help and discuss) | 23 (57.5%) |
| Mini-lecture (no preparation; teacher goes through Q&As with explanations/theory) | 24 (60.0%) |
| Total | 74 (185.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which self-study/seminar type(s) do you feel is/are most suited to your learning? | 2.8 | 1.1 | 38.3 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course?
NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly.
| Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| No (or I am not aware of it) | 35 (89.7%) |
| Yes, to write (parts of) my lab report for me. | 0 (0.0%) |
| Yes, to improve (the language of) my lab report. | 3 (7.7%) |
| Yes, to practise and learn chemistry. | 1 (2.6%) |
| Total | 39 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | 1.2 | 0.7 | 57.3 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 |