1BI051_Biochemistry_VT2026
Respondents: 64
Answer Count: 46
Answer Frequency: 71.88%
1BI051_Biochemistry_VT2026
Respondents: 64
Answer Count: 46
Answer Frequency: 71.88%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 4 (8.7%) |
| 4 | 8 (17.4%) |
| 5 | 20 (43.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 13 (28.3%) |
| Don't know | 1 (2.2%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 4.9 | 0.9 | 18.5 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (2.2%) |
| 2 | 1 (2.2%) |
| 3 | 3 (6.5%) |
| 4 | 3 (6.5%) |
| 5 | 11 (23.9%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 27 (58.7%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 5.2 | 1.2 | 22.8 % | 1.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 3 (6.5%) |
| 4 | 11 (23.9%) |
| 5 | 17 (37.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 14 (30.4%) |
| Don't know | 1 (2.2%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 4.9 | 0.9 | 18.5 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 1 (2.2%) |
| 4 | 13 (28.9%) |
| 5 | 20 (44.4%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 10 (22.2%) |
| Don't know | 1 (2.2%) |
| Total | 45 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.9 | 0.8 | 16.0 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 3 (6.7%) |
| 3 | 2 (4.4%) |
| 4 | 5 (11.1%) |
| 5 | 17 (37.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 17 (37.8%) |
| Don't know | 1 (2.2%) |
| Total | 45 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 5.0 | 1.2 | 23.1 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (2.2%) |
| 2 | 1 (2.2%) |
| 3 | 3 (6.5%) |
| 4 | 10 (21.7%) |
| 5 | 16 (34.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 14 (30.4%) |
| Don't know | 1 (2.2%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 4.8 | 1.2 | 24.2 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning.
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (2.2%) |
| 2 | 2 (4.3%) |
| 3 | 2 (4.3%) |
| 4 | 18 (39.1%) |
| 5 | 9 (19.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 12 (26.1%) |
| Don't know | 2 (4.3%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | 4.5 | 1.2 | 26.6 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded?
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Far too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| Too low | 2 (4.3%) |
| Appropriate | 30 (65.2%) |
| Too high | 12 (26.1%) |
| Far too high | 2 (4.3%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | 3.3 | 0.6 | 19.0 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
How do you rate the different lab exercises?
Protein purification and characterisation lab
Protein purification and characterisation lab | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 2 (4.5%) |
| OK | 14 (31.8%) |
| good | 12 (27.3%) |
| very good | 16 (36.4%) |
| Total | 44 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein purification and characterisation lab | 4.0 | 0.9 | 23.7 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lipid Lab
| Lipid Lab | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 2 (4.5%) |
| poor | 3 (6.8%) |
| OK | 9 (20.5%) |
| good | 16 (36.4%) |
| very good | 14 (31.8%) |
| Total | 44 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid Lab | 3.8 | 1.1 | 28.6 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Insulin lab
| Insulin lab | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.2%) |
| poor | 2 (4.4%) |
| OK | 2 (4.4%) |
| good | 18 (40.0%) |
| very good | 22 (48.9%) |
| Total | 45 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin lab | 4.3 | 0.9 | 21.5 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Project work Lipids
| Project work Lipids | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.3%) |
| poor | 4 (9.1%) |
| OK | 20 (45.5%) |
| good | 9 (20.5%) |
| very good | 10 (22.7%) |
| Total | 44 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project work Lipids | 3.5 | 1.0 | 29.0 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Project work Metabolism in health and disease
| Project work Metabolism in health and disease | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.3%) |
| poor | 8 (18.2%) |
| OK | 14 (31.8%) |
| good | 10 (22.7%) |
| very good | 11 (25.0%) |
| Total | 44 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project work Metabolism in health and disease | 3.5 | 1.1 | 32.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
To what extent did the two project works (Lipids and Metabolism in Health and Disease) contribute to your learning in relation to the time and effort required?
| To what extent did the two project works (Lipids and Metabolism in Health and Disease) contribute to your learning in relation to the time and effort required? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very high value relative to effort | 5 (11.1%) |
| High value relative to effort | 8 (17.8%) |
| Reasonable balance between value and effort | 12 (26.7%) |
| Somewhat too much effort for the learning gained | 19 (42.2%) |
| Too much effort for the learning gained | 5 (11.1%) |
| Total | 49 (108.9%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To what extent did the two project works (Lipids and Metabolism in Health and Disease) contribute to your learning in relation to the time and effort required? | 3.2 | 1.2 | 36.0 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
I had a clear understanding of what I was expected to learn during the course.
| I had a clear understanding of what I was expected to learn during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Yes | 38 (84.4%) |
| No | 7 (15.6%) |
| Total | 45 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I had a clear understanding of what I was expected to learn during the course. | 1.2 | 0.4 | 31.7 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Did you use any generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Copilot, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly.
| Did you use any generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Copilot, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| No (or I am not aware of it). | 11 (23.9%) |
| Yes, to write (parts of) my lab report for me. | 0 (0.0%) |
| Yes, to improve (the language of) my lab report. | 16 (34.8%) |
| Yes, to prepare the PW presentation. | 11 (23.9%) |
| Yes, to improve my understanding of topics learnt in the course. | 34 (73.9%) |
| Total | 72 (156.5%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you use any generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Copilot, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | 3.8 | 1.4 | 37.8 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Did you attend the workshop Paraphrasing and assessing reliability between information sources on February 13th?
| Did you attend the workshop Paraphrasing and assessing reliability between information sources on February 13th? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Yes | 3 (6.8%) |
| No, because I feel already confident in how to use AI. | 18 (40.9%) |
| No, because there were various other obligatory tasks that I needed to prioritize (lab report, project work) | 30 (68.2%) |
| No, because it was unclear that the AI workshop could be used to prepare the project work lipids presentation. | 7 (15.9%) |
| Total | 58 (131.8%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you attend the workshop Paraphrasing and assessing reliability between information sources on February 13th? | 2.7 | 0.7 | 27.7 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Did you attend the COPE seminar on January 20th (workshop with student well being center)?
| Did you attend the COPE seminar on January 20th (workshop with student well being center)? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Yes | 16 (34.8%) |
| No | 30 (65.2%) |
| Total | 46 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you attend the COPE seminar on January 20th (workshop with student well being center)? | 1.7 | 0.5 | 29.1 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |