HT25 General and Organic Chemistry
Respondents: 71
Answer Count: 54
Answer Frequency: 76.06%
HT25 General and Organic Chemistry
Respondents: 71
Answer Count: 54
Answer Frequency: 76.06%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (1.9%) |
| 2 | 1 (1.9%) |
| 3 | 7 (13.0%) |
| 4 | 9 (16.7%) |
| 5 | 20 (37.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 15 (27.8%) |
| Don't know | 1 (1.9%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 4.7 | 1.2 | 25.1 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (1.9%) |
| 2 | 3 (5.6%) |
| 3 | 3 (5.6%) |
| 4 | 9 (16.7%) |
| 5 | 15 (27.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 23 (42.6%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 4.9 | 1.3 | 26.0 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 2 (3.7%) |
| 2 | 7 (13.0%) |
| 3 | 9 (16.7%) |
| 4 | 11 (20.4%) |
| 5 | 16 (29.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 9 (16.7%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 4.1 | 1.4 | 34.6 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
In my view, the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded.
| In my view, the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 6 (11.1%) |
| 2 | 3 (5.6%) |
| 3 | 6 (11.1%) |
| 4 | 17 (31.5%) |
| 5 | 17 (31.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 5 (9.3%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded. | 3.9 | 1.4 | 36.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 2 (3.7%) |
| 2 | 1 (1.9%) |
| 3 | 5 (9.3%) |
| 4 | 12 (22.2%) |
| 5 | 22 (40.7%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 10 (18.5%) |
| Don't know | 2 (3.7%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.6 | 1.2 | 26.2 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 2 (3.8%) |
| 3 | 2 (3.8%) |
| 4 | 8 (15.1%) |
| 5 | 21 (39.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 17 (32.1%) |
| Don't know | 3 (5.7%) |
| Total | 53 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 5.0 | 1.0 | 20.5 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (1.9%) |
| 3 | 1 (1.9%) |
| 4 | 6 (11.1%) |
| 5 | 17 (31.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 29 (53.7%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | 5.3 | 0.9 | 16.7 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 5 (9.3%) |
| 3 | 5 (9.3%) |
| 4 | 13 (24.1%) |
| 5 | 15 (27.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 15 (27.8%) |
| Don't know | 1 (1.9%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 4.6 | 1.3 | 27.7 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 6 (11.1%) |
| 3 | 6 (11.1%) |
| 4 | 12 (22.2%) |
| 5 | 14 (25.9%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 9 (16.7%) |
| Don't know | 7 (13.0%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | 4.3 | 1.3 | 29.9 % | 2.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Rate the following teaching modules
Lecture
| Lecture | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 4 (7.4%) |
| poor | 5 (9.3%) |
| OK | 22 (40.7%) |
| good | 19 (35.2%) |
| very good | 4 (7.4%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture | 3.3 | 1.0 | 30.5 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Seminar
| Seminar | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 4 (7.5%) |
| poor | 5 (9.4%) |
| OK | 15 (28.3%) |
| good | 12 (22.6%) |
| very good | 17 (32.1%) |
| Total | 53 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar | 3.6 | 1.2 | 34.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Self-Study
| Self-Study | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 9 (17.3%) |
| poor | 5 (9.6%) |
| OK | 16 (30.8%) |
| good | 16 (30.8%) |
| very good | 6 (11.5%) |
| Total | 52 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Study | 3.1 | 1.3 | 40.6 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Labs
| Labs | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 8 (14.8%) |
| good | 21 (38.9%) |
| very good | 25 (46.3%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labs | 4.3 | 0.7 | 16.7 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Intermediate Test
| Intermediate Test | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| OK | 12 (23.5%) |
| good | 21 (41.2%) |
| very good | 17 (33.3%) |
| Total | 51 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermediate Test | 4.1 | 0.8 | 20.0 % | 2.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Final Exam
| Final Exam | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (1.9%) |
| poor | 4 (7.5%) |
| OK | 10 (18.9%) |
| good | 27 (50.9%) |
| very good | 11 (20.8%) |
| Total | 53 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Exam | 3.8 | 0.9 | 24.2 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
For the entire course rate the attitude of the people (staff) you have been in contact with the MBB on the course.
Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp)
| Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (1.9%) |
| poor | 1 (1.9%) |
| OK | 4 (7.4%) |
| good | 16 (29.6%) |
| very good | 32 (59.3%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp) | 4.4 | 0.9 | 19.4 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lecturers
| Lecturers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 2 (3.7%) |
| poor | 1 (1.9%) |
| OK | 20 (37.0%) |
| good | 25 (46.3%) |
| very good | 6 (11.1%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecturers | 3.6 | 0.9 | 23.9 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Seminar teachers
| Seminar teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 8 (15.4%) |
| OK | 17 (32.7%) |
| good | 17 (32.7%) |
| very good | 10 (19.2%) |
| Total | 52 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar teachers | 3.6 | 1.0 | 27.5 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Self-Study help teachers
| Self-Study help teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 4 (8.2%) |
| poor | 8 (16.3%) |
| OK | 15 (30.6%) |
| good | 12 (24.5%) |
| very good | 10 (20.4%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Study help teachers | 3.3 | 1.2 | 36.5 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Lab teachers
| Lab teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (1.9%) |
| poor | 3 (5.7%) |
| OK | 9 (17.0%) |
| good | 19 (35.8%) |
| very good | 21 (39.6%) |
| Total | 53 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lab teachers | 4.1 | 1.0 | 24.4 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury)
| Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.1%) |
| OK | 12 (25.5%) |
| good | 16 (34.0%) |
| very good | 18 (38.3%) |
| Total | 47 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury) | 4.1 | 0.9 | 20.9 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Course lab (Margareta Kling Pilström & Joseph Bruton)
| Course lab (Margareta Kling Pilström & Joseph Bruton) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 2 (3.7%) |
| OK | 8 (14.8%) |
| good | 19 (35.2%) |
| very good | 25 (46.3%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course lab (Margareta Kling Pilström & Joseph Bruton) | 4.2 | 0.8 | 19.9 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course?
NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly.
| Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| No, I didnt need it for anything | 7 (13.0%) |
| No, because I think it is bad for my learning | 5 (9.3%) |
| No, because I was afraid it could introduce plagiarism/cheating | 4 (7.4%) |
| No, because I dont know how to use it | 1 (1.9%) |
| Yes, to write (parts of) my lab report for me. | 1 (1.9%) |
| Yes, to improve (the language of) my lab report. | 18 (33.3%) |
| Yes, to practise and learn chemistry. | 34 (63.0%) |
| Other, please give comment | 3 (5.6%) |
| Total | 73 (135.2%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | 4.4 | 2.8 | 63.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 18.0 |
The Canvas page "Preparatory chemistry support for biomedicine students" is there to support your basic chemistry knowledge before and during the course. When and how did you use it?
| The Canvas page "Preparatory chemistry support for biomedicine students" is there to support your basic chemistry knowledge before and during the course. When and how did you use it? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Did the quizzes | 9 (19.6%) |
| Read up on the theory | 12 (26.1%) |
| Prepared before the GOC course | 19 (41.3%) |
| Used it during the GOC course | 6 (13.0%) |
| Didnt know this existed | 15 (32.6%) |
| Total | 61 (132.6%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Canvas page "Preparatory chemistry support for biomedicine students" is there to support your basic chemistry knowledge before and during the course. When and how did you use it? | 3.1 | 1.4 | 44.4 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Did you attend the voluntary laboratory skills session offered at the start of the course?
| Did you attend the voluntary laboratory skills session offered at the start of the course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Yes | 14 (25.9%) |
| No | 40 (74.1%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you attend the voluntary laboratory skills session offered at the start of the course? | -5.4 | 6.2 | NaN % | -9.0 | -9.0 | -9.0 | -2.0 | 5.0 |
How useful did you find the session?
| How useful did you find the session? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Not useful | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1 (8.3%) | |
| Somewhat useful | 1 (8.3%) |
| 5 (41.7%) | |
| Very useful | 5 (41.7%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How useful did you find the session? | 4.2 | 0.9 | 22.5 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
How much previous lab experience did you have at the start of the GOC course?
| How much previous lab experience did you have at the start of the GOC course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| None | 4 (28.6%) |
| 3 (21.4%) | |
| Some (days in school, e.g.) | 5 (35.7%) |
| 1 (7.1%) | |
| Extensive (e.g. studied before, intership) | 1 (7.1%) |
| Total | 14 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How much previous lab experience did you have at the start of the GOC course? | 2.4 | 1.2 | 50.3 % | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Do you think offering a voluntary skills session before the start of the course is useful for future students?
| Do you think offering a voluntary skills session before the start of the course is useful for future students? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Yes, definitely | 11 (78.6%) |
| Possibly, depending on prior experience | 3 (21.4%) |
| Not really | 0 (0.0%) |
| No opinion | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 14 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Do you think offering a voluntary skills session before the start of the course is useful for future students? | 1.2 | 0.4 | 35.1 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Why did you not attend the voluntary lab skills session? Select all applicable
| Why did you not attend the voluntary lab skills session? Select all applicable | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| I already have extensive lab experience | 26 (65.0%) |
| I did not have time | 4 (10.0%) |
| I was not aware of it | 0 (0.0%) |
| I couldnt make it but I would have liked to attend | 2 (5.0%) |
| I planned to attend but forgot / missed the registration deadline | 1 (2.5%) |
| I prefer learning directly during regular lab sessions | 12 (30.0%) |
| If other, please specify | 3 (7.5%) |
| Total | 48 (120.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why did you not attend the voluntary lab skills session? Select all applicable | 2.9 | 2.4 | 82.1 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 |
How much previous lab experience did you have at the start of the GOC course?
| How much previous lab experience did you have at the start of the GOC course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| None | 1 (2.6%) |
| 3 (7.7%) | |
| Some (days in school e.g.) | 15 (38.5%) |
| 14 (35.9%) | |
| Extensive (e.g. studied before, intership) | 6 (15.4%) |
| Total | 39 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How much previous lab experience did you have at the start of the GOC course? | 3.5 | 0.9 | 26.6 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The workshop on academic writing and generative AI was useful for my learning. (Dont know = Didnt attend)
| The workshop on academic writing and generative AI was useful for my learning. (Dont know = Didnt attend) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 15 (27.8%) |
| 2 | 5 (9.3%) |
| 3 | 7 (13.0%) |
| 4 | 3 (5.6%) |
| 5 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 1 (1.9%) |
| Don't know | 23 (42.6%) |
| Total | 54 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The workshop on academic writing and generative AI was useful for my learning. (Dont know = Didnt attend) | 2.1 | 1.3 | 62.5 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 |