2LK111 Part Reproduction Solna, Spring 2024

Respondents: 10
Answer Count: 5
Answer Frequency: 50.00%

My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.

My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (20.0%)
To some extent	1 (20.0%)
To a large extent	2 (40.0%)
To a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.	3.6	1.1	31.7 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.

I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	3 (60.0%)
To a large extent	0 (0.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.	3.8	1.1	28.8 %	3.0	3.0	3.0	5.0	5.0

The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.

The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (20.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (60.0%)
To a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.	3.8	1.1	28.8 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.

The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (20.0%)
To some extent	1 (20.0%)
To a large extent	0 (0.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (60.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.	4.0	1.4	35.4 %	2.0	3.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.

I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (20.0%)
To a large extent	2 (40.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.	4.2	0.8	19.9 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.

The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (20.0%)
To a large extent	1 (20.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (60.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.	4.4	0.9	20.3 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.

I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (20.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	2 (40.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.	4.0	1.2	30.6 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.

The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (20.0%)
To some extent	2 (40.0%)
To a large extent	1 (20.0%)
To a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.	3.4	1.1	33.5 %	2.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.

The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	1 (20.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	2 (40.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.	5.2	0.8	16.1 %	4.0	5.0	5.0	6.0	6.0

Do you consider that your learning effort during Part Reproduction corresponded to full-time studies?

Do you consider that your learning effort during Part Reproduction corresponded to full-time studies?	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	0 (0.0%)
To a very large extent	5 (100.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Do you consider that your learning effort during Part Reproduction corresponded to full-time studies?	5.0	0.0	0.0 %	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The quiz was relevant to the course´s learning objectives.

The quiz was relevant to the course´s learning objectives.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (60.0%)
To a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The quiz was relevant to the course´s learning objectives.	4.6	0.9	19.4 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	6.0

I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.

I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	0 (0.0%)
To a very large extent	5 (100.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.	5.0	0.0	0.0 %	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The seminars/practical training/IPL were a support in my learning process during Part Reproduction?

Seminar Complications of pregnancy

Seminar Complications of pregnancy	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	2 (40.0%)
to a large extent	2 (40.0%)
to a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Complications of pregnancy	3.8	0.8	22.0 %	3.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Seminar Mixed cases

Seminar Mixed cases	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	2 (40.0%)
to a large extent	2 (40.0%)
to a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Mixed cases	3.8	0.8	22.0 %	3.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

TBL-seminar Bleeding during pregnancy

TBL-seminar Bleeding during pregnancy	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (20.0%)
to a large extent	0 (0.0%)
to a very large extent	4 (80.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
TBL-seminar Bleeding during pregnancy	4.6	0.9	19.4 %	3.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

TBL-seminar Abnormal uterine bleeding

TBL-seminar Abnormal uterine bleeding	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (20.0%)
to a large extent	0 (0.0%)
to a very large extent	4 (80.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
TBL-seminar Abnormal uterine bleeding	4.6	0.9	19.4 %	3.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Seminar Pelvic masses

Seminar Pelvic masses	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	2 (50.0%)
to a large extent	1 (25.0%)
to a very large extent	1 (25.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Pelvic masses	3.8	1.0	25.5 %	3.0	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0

Practical training at KTC

Practical training at KTC	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (20.0%)
to a large extent	1 (20.0%)
to a very large extent	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Practical training at KTC	4.4	0.9	20.3 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

IPL at KTC

IPL at KTC	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	2 (40.0%)
to a large extent	0 (0.0%)
to a very large extent	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
IPL at KTC	4.2	1.1	26.1 %	3.0	3.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Questions about clinical rotation

During clinical rotation, I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.

During clinical rotation, I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	4 (80.0%)
To a large extent	0 (0.0%)
To a very large extent	1 (20.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation, I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.	3.4	0.9	26.3 %	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	5.0

During clinical rotation, the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).

During clinical rotation, the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	2 (40.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (60.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation, the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).	4.6	0.5	11.9 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

During clinical rotation, I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.

During clinical rotation, I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (20.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	2 (40.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation, I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.	4.0	1.2	30.6 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.

The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (20.0%)
To a large extent	1 (20.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (60.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.	4.4	0.9	20.3 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

I took part in relevant activities during my clinical rotation.

I took part in relevant activities during my clinical rotation.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	4 (100.0%)
To a very large extent	0 (0.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I took part in relevant activities during my clinical rotation.	4.0	0.0	0.0 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0

I was appointed a supervisor during my clinical rotation.

I was appointed a supervisor during my clinical rotation.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (60.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I was appointed a supervisor during my clinical rotation.	4.4	0.5	12.4 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the rotation.

My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the rotation.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (60.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (40.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the rotation.	4.4	0.5	12.4 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?

Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?	Number of responses
No	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at one to three occasions	1 (20.0%)
Yes, at four to six occasions	3 (60.0%)
Yes, at seven to ten occasions	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at more than ten occasions	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?	3.2	1.1	34.2 %	2.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	5.0

Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?

Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?	Number of responses
No	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at one to three occasions	1 (20.0%)
Yes, at four to six occasions	4 (80.0%)
Yes, at seven to ten occasions	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at more than ten occasions	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?	2.8	0.4	16.0 %	2.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0

How do you value the clinical rotation during Part Reproduction?

GKS: Gynecologic endocrinology

GKS: Gynecologic endocrinology	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
GKS: Gynecologic endocrinology	4.2	1.3	31.0 %	2.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

GKS: Clinic for hereditary cancer

GKS: Clinic for hereditary cancer	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (100.0%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	0 (0.0%)
Total	2 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
GKS: Clinic for hereditary cancer	3.0	0.0	0.0 %	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0

Danderyd gynecology clinic

Danderyd gynecology clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (25.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (25.0%)
good	1 (25.0%)
very good	1 (25.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Danderyd gynecology clinic	3.5	1.3	36.9 %	2.0	2.5	3.5	4.5	5.0

Danderyd gynecology emergency room

Danderyd gynecology emergency room	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	2 (40.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Danderyd gynecology emergency room	4.6	0.5	11.9 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Södertälje gynecology clinic

Södertälje gynecology clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (33.3%)
good	1 (33.3%)
very good	1 (33.3%)
Total	3 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Södertälje gynecology clinic	4.0	1.0	25.0 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	4.5	5.0

Huddinge abortion clinic

Huddinge abortion clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (100.0%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	0 (0.0%)
Total	1 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Huddinge abortion clinic	3.0	0.0	NaN %	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0

NKS: Gynecologic oncology

NKS: Gynecologic oncology	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	2 (40.0%)
very good	1 (20.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Gynecologic oncology	3.6	1.1	31.7 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Octavia gynecology clinic

Octavia gynecology clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	1 (33.3%)
very good	2 (66.7%)
Total	3 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Octavia gynecology clinic	4.7	0.6	12.4 %	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

C-Medical Gynecology

C-Medical Gynecology	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	1 (33.3%)
very good	2 (66.7%)
Total	3 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
C-Medical Gynecology	4.7	0.6	12.4 %	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

EsterCare gynecology clinic

EsterCare gynecology clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	1 (33.3%)
very good	2 (66.7%)
Total	3 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
EsterCare gynecology clinic	4.7	0.6	12.4 %	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

NKS: Student outpatient clinic

NKS: Student outpatient clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	4 (80.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Student outpatient clinic	4.8	0.4	9.3 %	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

NKS: Delivery ward with doctor

NKS: Delivery ward with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Delivery ward with doctor	4.4	0.9	20.3 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

NKS: Emergency specialist prenatal care with doctor (Akut-spec)

NKS: Emergency specialist prenatal care with doctor (Akut-spec)	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	4 (80.0%)
very good	0 (0.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Emergency specialist prenatal care with doctor (Akut-spec)	3.8	0.4	11.8 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0

NKS: Antenatal ward with doctor

NKS: Antenatal ward with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (50.0%)
good	1 (25.0%)
very good	1 (25.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Antenatal ward with doctor	3.8	1.0	25.5 %	3.0	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0

NKS: Postnatal ward with doctor

NKS: Postnatal ward with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	3 (75.0%)
good	1 (25.0%)
very good	0 (0.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Postnatal ward with doctor	3.2	0.5	15.4 %	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.5	4.0

NKS: Delivery ward with midwife

NKS: Delivery ward with midwife	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	0 (0.0%)
very good	5 (100.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Delivery ward with midwife	5.0	0.0	0.0 %	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

NKS: Ultrasound

NKS: Ultrasound	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
NKS: Ultrasound	4.4	0.9	20.3 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Sundbyberg Midwifery clinic

Sundbyberg Midwifery clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	2 (40.0%)
very good	3 (60.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Sundbyberg Midwifery clinic	4.6	0.5	11.9 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Have you, during any clinical rotation in the course, been trained on how to:

Have you, during any clinical rotation in the course, been trained on how to:	Number of responses
Prescribe medication	0 (0.0%)
Prescribe intravenous infusion	0 (0.0%)
Prescribe medication (in a prescription module in Take Care)	0 (0.0%)
Provide oral medication orders to nurses	0 (0.0%)
Total	0 (0.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you, during any clinical rotation in the course, been trained on how to:	0.0	0.0	NaN %	∞	0.0	0.0	0.0	-∞

What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?

What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	4 (80.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?	4.8	0.4	9.3 %	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Thank you for your feedback!