Degree project in biostatistics and data science VT2026
Respondents: 33
Answer Count: 12
Answer Frequency: 36.36%
Degree project in biostatistics and data science VT2026
Respondents: 33
Answer Count: 12
Answer Frequency: 36.36%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 2 (16.7%) |
| 3 | 1 (8.3%) |
| 4 | 2 (16.7%) |
| 5 | 7 (58.3%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 0 (0.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 4.2 | 1.2 | 28.6 % | 2.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (8.3%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 1 (8.3%) |
| 5 | 1 (8.3%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 9 (75.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 5.3 | 1.5 | 28.1 % | 1.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (8.3%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 3 (25.0%) |
| 5 | 6 (50.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 2 (16.7%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 4.6 | 1.3 | 28.6 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning.
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (8.3%) |
| 2 | 2 (16.7%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 3 (25.0%) |
| 5 | 2 (16.7%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 4 (33.3%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | 4.2 | 1.8 | 41.5 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded?
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Far too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| Too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| Appropriate | 10 (83.3%) |
| Too high | 2 (16.7%) |
| Far too high | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | 3.2 | 0.4 | 12.3 % | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
What was the primary mechanism by which you identified a project/supervisor?
| What was the primary mechanism by which you identified a project/supervisor? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| BDS project database | 2 (16.7%) |
| Via contact with, or facilitated by, a course teacher | 4 (33.3%) |
| Biostatistics network event | 1 (8.3%) |
| Project fair (organised with the biomedicine programme) | 1 (8.3%) |
| By “cold” contacting researchers | 3 (25.0%) |
| Other | 1 (8.3%) |
| Total | 12 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What was the primary mechanism by which you identified a project/supervisor? | 3.2 | 1.7 | 55.2 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 6.0 |