HT24 General and Organic Chemistry
Respondents: 71
Answer Count: 50
Answer Frequency: 70.42%
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 3 (6.0%) |
| to some extent | 8 (16.0%) |
| to a large extent | 27 (54.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 12 (24.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | 4.0 | 0.8 | 20.4 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.0%) |
| to a small extent | 6 (12.0%) |
| to some extent | 17 (34.0%) |
| to a large extent | 16 (32.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 9 (18.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | 3.5 | 1.1 | 30.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.0%) |
| to some extent | 10 (20.0%) |
| to a large extent | 22 (44.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 16 (32.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | 4.0 | 0.8 | 20.6 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 4 (8.0%) |
| to some extent | 15 (30.0%) |
| to a large extent | 21 (42.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 10 (20.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | 3.7 | 0.9 | 23.4 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.0%) |
| to some extent | 13 (26.0%) |
| to a large extent | 21 (42.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 14 (28.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | 3.9 | 0.8 | 21.4 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded?
| To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| To a very small extent | 3 (6.0%) |
| To a small extent | 4 (8.0%) |
| To some extent | 16 (32.0%) |
| To a large extent | 18 (36.0%) |
| To a very large extent | 9 (18.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded? | 3.5 | 1.1 | 30.5 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.0%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.0%) |
| to some extent | 10 (20.0%) |
| to a large extent | 23 (46.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 13 (26.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 3.9 | 1.0 | 25.6 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 3 (6.0%) |
| to a small extent | 4 (8.0%) |
| to some extent | 16 (32.0%) |
| to a large extent | 24 (48.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 3 (6.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 3.4 | 0.9 | 27.9 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 9 (18.0%) |
| to a large extent | 21 (42.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 20 (40.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | 4.2 | 0.7 | 17.5 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 5 (10.0%) |
| to some extent | 7 (14.0%) |
| to a large extent | 24 (48.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 14 (28.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 3.9 | 0.9 | 23.2 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.0%) |
| to a small extent | 5 (10.2%) |
| to some extent | 23 (46.9%) |
| to a large extent | 16 (32.7%) |
| to a very large extent | 4 (8.2%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | 3.3 | 0.9 | 25.6 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
What is your overall opinion of the course?
| What is your overall opinion of the course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.1%) |
| OK | 19 (39.6%) |
| good | 19 (39.6%) |
| very good | 9 (18.8%) |
| Total | 48 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is your overall opinion of the course? | 3.8 | 0.8 | 20.9 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Rate the following teaching modules
Lecture
| Lecture | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 3 (6.0%) |
| OK | 19 (38.0%) |
| good | 21 (42.0%) |
| very good | 7 (14.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture | 3.6 | 0.8 | 22.0 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Seminar
| Seminar | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 7 (14.3%) |
| OK | 14 (28.6%) |
| good | 12 (24.5%) |
| very good | 16 (32.7%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar | 3.8 | 1.1 | 28.5 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Self-Study
| Self-Study | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 5 (10.2%) |
| poor | 3 (6.1%) |
| OK | 14 (28.6%) |
| good | 15 (30.6%) |
| very good | 12 (24.5%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Study | 3.5 | 1.2 | 34.7 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Labs
| Labs | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| OK | 7 (14.0%) |
| good | 16 (32.0%) |
| very good | 26 (52.0%) |
| Total | 50 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labs | 4.3 | 0.8 | 18.4 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Intermediate Test
| Intermediate Test | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 2 (4.1%) |
| OK | 13 (26.5%) |
| good | 16 (32.7%) |
| very good | 18 (36.7%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermediate Test | 4.0 | 0.9 | 22.4 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Final Exam
| Final Exam | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 6 (12.2%) |
| poor | 6 (12.2%) |
| OK | 23 (46.9%) |
| good | 11 (22.4%) |
| very good | 3 (6.1%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Exam | 3.0 | 1.1 | 35.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
For the entire course rate the attitude of the people (staff) you have been in contact with the MBB on the course.
Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp)
| Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 3 (6.2%) |
| good | 10 (20.8%) |
| very good | 35 (72.9%) |
| Total | 48 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course leader (Bernhard Lohkamp) | 4.7 | 0.6 | 12.8 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lecturers
| Lecturers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 4 (8.3%) |
| OK | 16 (33.3%) |
| good | 22 (45.8%) |
| very good | 6 (12.5%) |
| Total | 48 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecturers | 3.6 | 0.8 | 22.5 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Seminar teachers
| Seminar teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.1%) |
| OK | 16 (33.3%) |
| good | 13 (27.1%) |
| very good | 18 (37.5%) |
| Total | 48 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar teachers | 4.0 | 0.9 | 22.5 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Self-Study help teachers
| Self-Study help teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.1%) |
| poor | 3 (6.2%) |
| OK | 15 (31.2%) |
| good | 12 (25.0%) |
| very good | 17 (35.4%) |
| Total | 48 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Study help teachers | 3.9 | 1.1 | 27.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lab teachers
| Lab teachers | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| OK | 10 (20.4%) |
| good | 16 (32.7%) |
| very good | 22 (44.9%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lab teachers | 4.2 | 0.8 | 20.0 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury)
| Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.2%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 3 (6.7%) |
| good | 17 (37.8%) |
| very good | 24 (53.3%) |
| Total | 45 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course administrator (Anurupa Nagchowdhury) | 4.4 | 0.8 | 18.4 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Course lab (Margareta Kling Pilström & Joseph Bruton)
| Course lab (Margareta Kling Pilström & Joseph Bruton) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 5 (10.6%) |
| good | 17 (36.2%) |
| very good | 25 (53.2%) |
| Total | 47 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course lab (Margareta Kling Pilström & Joseph Bruton) | 4.4 | 0.7 | 15.4 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course?
NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly.
| Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| No, I didnt need it for anything | 16 (32.7%) |
| No, because I think it is bad for my learning | 6 (12.2%) |
| No, because I was afraid it could introduce plagiarism/cheating | 3 (6.1%) |
| No, because I dont know how to use it | 4 (8.2%) |
| Yes, to write (parts of) my lab report for me. | 0 (0.0%) |
| Yes, to improve (the language of) my lab report. | 8 (16.3%) |
| Yes, to practise and learn chemistry. | 17 (34.7%) |
| Other, please give comment | 8 (16.3%) |
| Total | 62 (126.5%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you use any AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | 5.6 | 4.1 | 72.2 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 18.0 |
The Canvas page "Preparatory chemistry support for biomedicine students" is there to support your basic chemistry knowledge before and during the course. When and how did you use it?
| The Canvas page "Preparatory chemistry support for biomedicine students" is there to support your basic chemistry knowledge before and during the course. When and how did you use it? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Did the quizzes | 5 (12.8%) |
| Read up on the theory | 18 (46.2%) |
| Prepared before the GOC course | 15 (38.5%) |
| Used it during the GOC course | 5 (12.8%) |
| Didnt know this existed | 7 (17.9%) |
| Total | 50 (128.2%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Canvas page "Preparatory chemistry support for biomedicine students" is there to support your basic chemistry knowledge before and during the course. When and how did you use it? | 2.8 | 1.2 | 42.2 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 |