Degree project in nutrition science (30, 45 and 60 credits) 2025/2026
Respondents: 29
Answer Count: 5
Answer Frequency: 17.24%
Degree project in nutrition science (30, 45 and 60 credits) 2025/2026
Respondents: 29
Answer Count: 5
Answer Frequency: 17.24%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5 | 3 (60.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 2 (40.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 5.4 | 0.5 | 10.1 % | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5 | 3 (60.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 2 (40.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 5.4 | 0.5 | 10.1 % | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 1 (20.0%) |
| 5 | 4 (80.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 0 (0.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 4.8 | 0.4 | 9.3 % | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Did you do a 30, 45 or 60 credits degree project:
| Did you do a 30, 45 or 60 credits degree project: | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 30 credits | 2 (40.0%) |
| 45 credits | 0 (0.0%) |
| 60 credits | 3 (60.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you do a 30, 45 or 60 credits degree project: | 2.2 | 1.1 | 49.8 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information)
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5 | 1 (20.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 4 (80.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information) | 5.8 | 0.4 | 7.7 % | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The workload was reasonable in relation to the course's credits.
| The workload was reasonable in relation to the course's credits. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5 | 2 (40.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 3 (60.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The workload was reasonable in relation to the course's credits. | 5.6 | 0.5 | 9.8 % | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The examination (written report, oral presentation, discussion with examiner and opponent, and student opposition) was an opportunity for learning.
| The examination (written report, oral presentation, discussion with examiner and opponent, and student opposition) was an opportunity for learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5 | 2 (40.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 3 (60.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination (written report, oral presentation, discussion with examiner and opponent, and student opposition) was an opportunity for learning. | 5.6 | 0.5 | 9.8 % | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The supervision and communication with the supervisor(s) worked well.
| The supervision and communication with the supervisor(s) worked well. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 2 (40.0%) |
| 5 | 1 (20.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 2 (40.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 5 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The supervision and communication with the supervisor(s) worked well. | 5.0 | 1.0 | 20.0 % | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |