HT24 Introduction to Biomedical Science

Respondents: 72
Answer Count: 52
Answer Frequency: 72.22%

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (1.9%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	16 (30.8%)
to a large extent	28 (53.8%)
to a very large extent	7 (13.5%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.	3.8	0.8	20.1 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (1.9%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	10 (19.2%)
to a large extent	32 (61.5%)
to a very large extent	9 (17.3%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.	3.9	0.7	18.8 %	1.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	3 (5.8%)
to some extent	13 (25.0%)
to a large extent	26 (50.0%)
to a very large extent	10 (19.2%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.	3.8	0.8	21.2 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (1.9%)
to a small extent	3 (5.8%)
to some extent	17 (32.7%)
to a large extent	17 (32.7%)
to a very large extent	14 (26.9%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).	3.8	1.0	26.1 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (1.9%)
to a small extent	1 (1.9%)
to some extent	8 (15.4%)
to a large extent	22 (42.3%)
to a very large extent	20 (38.5%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.	4.1	0.9	21.4 %	1.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded?

To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded?	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (3.8%)
To some extent	14 (26.9%)
To a large extent	21 (40.4%)
To a very large extent	15 (28.8%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded?	3.9	0.8	21.6 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.

The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	6 (11.5%)
to a large extent	24 (46.2%)
to a very large extent	22 (42.3%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.	4.3	0.7	15.6 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.

The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	4 (7.7%)
to a large extent	23 (44.2%)
to a very large extent	25 (48.1%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.	4.4	0.6	14.4 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.

I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (1.9%)
to some extent	5 (9.6%)
to a large extent	25 (48.1%)
to a very large extent	21 (40.4%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.	4.3	0.7	16.8 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.

When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	2 (3.8%)
to some extent	8 (15.4%)
to a large extent	16 (30.8%)
to a very large extent	26 (50.0%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.	4.3	0.9	20.3 %	2.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.

The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (1.9%)
to a small extent	4 (7.7%)
to some extent	26 (50.0%)
to a large extent	16 (30.8%)
to a very large extent	5 (9.6%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.	3.4	0.8	24.9 %	1.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

What is your overall opinion of the course?

What is your overall opinion of the course?	Number of responses
very poor	0 (0.0%)
poor	1 (1.9%)
OK	4 (7.7%)
good	29 (55.8%)
very good	18 (34.6%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
What is your overall opinion of the course?	4.2	0.7	16.0 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Did the different teaching moments helped you to understand the content of the course?

Lectures

Lectures	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a smal extent	2 (3.9%)
to some extent	8 (15.7%)
to a large extent	29 (56.9%)
to a very large extent	12 (23.5%)
Total	51 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Lectures	4.0	0.7	18.7 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Group work in systematic anatomy

Group work in systematic anatomy	Number of responses
to a very small extent	4 (7.7%)
to a smal extent	3 (5.8%)
to some extent	11 (21.2%)
to a large extent	9 (17.3%)
to a very large extent	25 (48.1%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Group work in systematic anatomy	3.9	1.3	32.7 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Laborations

Laborations	Number of responses
to a very small extent	3 (5.8%)
to a smal extent	4 (7.7%)
to some extent	8 (15.4%)
to a large extent	24 (46.2%)
to a very large extent	13 (25.0%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Laborations	3.8	1.1	29.1 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

Project work Insulin

Project work Insulin	Number of responses
to a very small extent	1 (1.9%)
to a smal extent	3 (5.8%)
to some extent	14 (26.9%)
to a large extent	20 (38.5%)
to a very large extent	14 (26.9%)
Total	52 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Project work Insulin	3.8	1.0	25.2 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Excel Introduction as helping tool

Excel Introduction as helping tool	Number of responses
to a very small extent	3 (6.1%)
to a smal extent	5 (10.2%)
to some extent	19 (38.8%)
to a large extent	13 (26.5%)
to a very large extent	9 (18.4%)
Total	49 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Excel Introduction as helping tool	3.4	1.1	32.2 %	1.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	5.0