Course evaluation Degree project in Public heath sciences (4FH100) Spring 2024
Respondents: 40
Answer Count: 25
Answer Frequency: 62.50%
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a large extent | 8 (32.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 17 (68.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | 4.7 | 0.5 | 10.2 % | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to a large extent | 11 (44.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 13 (52.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | 4.5 | 0.6 | 13.1 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to a large extent | 11 (44.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 13 (52.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | 4.5 | 0.6 | 13.1 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a large extent | 8 (32.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 17 (68.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | 4.7 | 0.5 | 10.2 % | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 5 (20.0%) |
| to a large extent | 8 (32.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 12 (48.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | 4.3 | 0.8 | 18.5 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In which specialization are you registered?
| In which specialization are you registered? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Public Health Epidemiology | 12 (48.0%) |
| Health Promotion and Prevention | 13 (52.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In which specialization are you registered? | 1.5 | 0.5 | 33.5 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.
| In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to some extent | 4 (16.0%) |
| to a large extent | 8 (32.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 12 (48.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course. | 4.2 | 0.9 | 20.7 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.
| My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a large extent | 9 (36.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 15 (60.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course. | 4.5 | 0.9 | 19.5 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.
| I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to some extent | 4 (16.0%) |
| to a large extent | 10 (40.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 10 (40.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned. | 4.2 | 0.9 | 20.4 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to some extent | 1 (4.0%) |
| to a large extent | 8 (32.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 15 (60.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.5 | 0.8 | 17.2 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.
| The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 3 (12.0%) |
| to a large extent | 10 (40.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 12 (48.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations. | 4.4 | 0.7 | 16.1 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
I am overall satisfied with the support received from my main supervisor throughout the Degree project course.
| Number of responses | |
|---|---|
| Very little | 0 (0.0%) |
| Little | 2 (8.0%) |
| Some | 4 (16.0%) |
| Considerable | 3 (12.0%) |
| A great deal | 16 (64.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | 1.0 | 23.8 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
How much supervision did you receive from your main supervisor regarding the following?
a. Literature review
| a. Literature review | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Little | 6 (24.0%) |
| Some | 4 (16.0%) |
| Considerable | 8 (32.0%) |
| A great deal | 4 (16.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a. Literature review | 3.2 | 1.3 | 41.5 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
b. Ethical approval
| b. Ethical approval | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Some | 3 (12.0%) |
| Considerable | 4 (16.0%) |
| A great deal | 12 (48.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b. Ethical approval | 3.8 | 1.5 | 39.4 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
c. Formulating aim and research question(s)
| c. Formulating aim and research question(s) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 1 (4.0%) |
| Little | 1 (4.0%) |
| Some | 7 (28.0%) |
| Considerable | 6 (24.0%) |
| A great deal | 10 (40.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c. Formulating aim and research question(s) | 3.9 | 1.1 | 28.4 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
d. Data management
| d. Data management | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 4 (16.0%) |
| Little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Some | 6 (24.0%) |
| Considerable | 7 (28.0%) |
| A great deal | 5 (20.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d. Data management | 3.2 | 1.4 | 42.1 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
e. Statistical analysis
| e. Statistical analysis | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (13.0%) |
| Little | 4 (17.4%) |
| Some | 4 (17.4%) |
| Considerable | 3 (13.0%) |
| A great deal | 9 (39.1%) |
| Total | 23 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e. Statistical analysis | 3.5 | 1.5 | 43.2 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
f. Interpretation of results
| f. Interpretation of results | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 4 (16.0%) |
| Little | 2 (8.0%) |
| Some | 7 (28.0%) |
| Considerable | 7 (28.0%) |
| A great deal | 5 (20.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f. Interpretation of results | 3.3 | 1.3 | 40.8 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
g. Presentation of results
| g. Presentation of results | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 2 (8.0%) |
| Little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Some | 3 (12.0%) |
| Considerable | 10 (40.0%) |
| A great deal | 7 (28.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g. Presentation of results | 3.7 | 1.2 | 33.9 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
h. Writing up the thesis
| h. Writing up the thesis | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Little | 5 (20.0%) |
| Some | 5 (20.0%) |
| Considerable | 6 (24.0%) |
| A great deal | 6 (24.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h. Writing up the thesis | 3.3 | 1.4 | 41.8 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
i. Language editing
| i. Language editing | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Little | 4 (16.0%) |
| Some | 5 (20.0%) |
| Considerable | 5 (20.0%) |
| A great deal | 8 (32.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i. Language editing | 3.4 | 1.4 | 41.2 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
How much supervision did you receive from others (i.e., co-supervisor, other members of the research team) regarding the following?
a. Ethical approval
| a. Ethical approval | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 9 (37.5%) |
| Little | 4 (16.7%) |
| Some | 4 (16.7%) |
| Considerable | 3 (12.5%) |
| A great deal | 4 (16.7%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a. Ethical approval | 2.5 | 1.5 | 60.3 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
b. Time planning and management
| b. Time planning and management | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 8 (33.3%) |
| Little | 3 (12.5%) |
| Some | 5 (20.8%) |
| Considerable | 4 (16.7%) |
| A great deal | 4 (16.7%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b. Time planning and management | 2.7 | 1.5 | 56.0 % | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
c. Formulating aim and research question(s)
| c. Formulating aim and research question(s) | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (12.5%) |
| Little | 6 (25.0%) |
| Some | 2 (8.3%) |
| Considerable | 7 (29.2%) |
| A great deal | 6 (25.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c. Formulating aim and research question(s) | 3.3 | 1.4 | 43.4 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
d. Data management
| d. Data management | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 5 (20.8%) |
| Little | 3 (12.5%) |
| Some | 6 (25.0%) |
| Considerable | 5 (20.8%) |
| A great deal | 5 (20.8%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d. Data management | 3.1 | 1.4 | 46.8 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
e. Statistical analysis
| e. Statistical analysis | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (13.0%) |
| Little | 4 (17.4%) |
| Some | 3 (13.0%) |
| Considerable | 7 (30.4%) |
| A great deal | 6 (26.1%) |
| Total | 23 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e. Statistical analysis | 3.4 | 1.4 | 41.5 % | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
f. Interpretation of results
| f. Interpretation of results | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 4 (16.7%) |
| Little | 2 (8.3%) |
| Some | 7 (29.2%) |
| Considerable | 6 (25.0%) |
| A great deal | 5 (20.8%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f. Interpretation of results | 3.2 | 1.4 | 41.8 % | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
g. Presentation of results
| g. Presentation of results | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Little | 3 (12.0%) |
| Some | 6 (24.0%) |
| Considerable | 7 (28.0%) |
| A great deal | 6 (24.0%) |
| Total | 25 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g. Presentation of results | 3.4 | 1.3 | 38.9 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
h. Writing up the thesis
| h. Writing up the thesis | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 6 (25.0%) |
| Little | 2 (8.3%) |
| Some | 6 (25.0%) |
| Considerable | 4 (16.7%) |
| A great deal | 6 (25.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h. Writing up the thesis | 3.1 | 1.5 | 49.6 % | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
i. Language editing
| i. Language editing | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very little | 6 (25.0%) |
| Little | 1 (4.2%) |
| Some | 7 (29.2%) |
| Considerable | 5 (20.8%) |
| A great deal | 5 (20.8%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i. Language editing | 3.1 | 1.5 | 47.7 % | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |