Course evaluation Degree project in Public heath sciences (4FH100) Spring 2024

Respondents: 40
Answer Count: 25
Answer Frequency: 62.50%


 

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent0 (0.0%)
to a large extent8 (32.0%)
to a very large extent17 (68.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.4.70.510.2 %4.04.05.05.05.0

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent1 (4.0%)
to a large extent11 (44.0%)
to a very large extent13 (52.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.4.50.613.1 %3.04.05.05.05.0

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent1 (4.0%)
to a large extent11 (44.0%)
to a very large extent13 (52.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.4.50.613.1 %3.04.05.05.05.0

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent0 (0.0%)
to a large extent8 (32.0%)
to a very large extent17 (68.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).4.70.510.2 %4.04.05.05.05.0

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent5 (20.0%)
to a large extent8 (32.0%)
to a very large extent12 (48.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.4.30.818.5 %3.04.04.05.05.0

In which specialization are you registered?

In which specialization are you registered?Number of responses
Public Health Epidemiology12 (48.0%)
Health Promotion and Prevention13 (52.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In which specialization are you registered?1.50.533.5 %1.01.02.02.02.0

In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.

In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent1 (4.0%)
to some extent4 (16.0%)
to a large extent8 (32.0%)
to a very large extent12 (48.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.4.20.920.7 %2.04.04.05.05.0

My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.

My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.Number of responses
to a very small extent1 (4.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent0 (0.0%)
to a large extent9 (36.0%)
to a very large extent15 (60.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.4.50.919.5 %1.04.05.05.05.0

I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.

I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent1 (4.0%)
to some extent4 (16.0%)
to a large extent10 (40.0%)
to a very large extent10 (40.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.4.20.920.4 %2.04.04.05.05.0

The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.

The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent1 (4.0%)
to some extent1 (4.0%)
to a large extent8 (32.0%)
to a very large extent15 (60.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.4.50.817.2 %2.04.05.05.05.0

The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.

The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.Number of responses
to a very small extent0 (0.0%)
to a small extent0 (0.0%)
to some extent3 (12.0%)
to a large extent10 (40.0%)
to a very large extent12 (48.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.4.40.716.1 %3.04.04.05.05.0

I am overall satisfied with the support received from my main supervisor throughout the Degree project course.

 Number of responses
Very little 0 (0.0%)
Little 2 (8.0%)
Some4 (16.0%)
Considerable3 (12.0%)
A great deal 16 (64.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
 4.31.023.8 %2.04.05.05.05.0

How much supervision did you receive from your main supervisor regarding the following?

a. Literature review

a. Literature reviewNumber of responses
Very little 3 (12.0%)
Little 6 (24.0%)
Some4 (16.0%)
Considerable8 (32.0%)
A great deal 4 (16.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
a. Literature review3.21.341.5 %1.02.03.04.05.0

b. Ethical approval

b. Ethical approvalNumber of responses
Very little 3 (12.0%)
Little 3 (12.0%)
Some3 (12.0%)
Considerable4 (16.0%)
A great deal 12 (48.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
b. Ethical approval3.81.539.4 %1.03.04.05.05.0

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)Number of responses
Very little 1 (4.0%)
Little 1 (4.0%)
Some7 (28.0%)
Considerable6 (24.0%)
A great deal 10 (40.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
c. Formulating aim and research question(s)3.91.128.4 %1.03.04.05.05.0

d. Data management

d. Data managementNumber of responses
Very little 4 (16.0%)
Little 3 (12.0%)
Some6 (24.0%)
Considerable7 (28.0%)
A great deal 5 (20.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
d. Data management3.21.442.1 %1.02.03.04.05.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysisNumber of responses
Very little 3 (13.0%)
Little 4 (17.4%)
Some4 (17.4%)
Considerable3 (13.0%)
A great deal 9 (39.1%)
Total23 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
e. Statistical analysis3.51.543.2 %1.02.04.05.05.0

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of resultsNumber of responses
Very little 4 (16.0%)
Little 2 (8.0%)
Some7 (28.0%)
Considerable7 (28.0%)
A great deal 5 (20.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
f. Interpretation of results3.31.340.8 %1.03.03.04.05.0

g. Presentation of results

g. Presentation of results Number of responses
Very little 2 (8.0%)
Little 3 (12.0%)
Some3 (12.0%)
Considerable10 (40.0%)
A great deal 7 (28.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
g. Presentation of results 3.71.233.9 %1.03.04.05.05.0

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesisNumber of responses
Very little 3 (12.0%)
Little 5 (20.0%)
Some5 (20.0%)
Considerable6 (24.0%)
A great deal 6 (24.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
h. Writing up the thesis3.31.441.8 %1.02.03.04.05.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editingNumber of responses
Very little 3 (12.0%)
Little 4 (16.0%)
Some5 (20.0%)
Considerable5 (20.0%)
A great deal 8 (32.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
i. Language editing3.41.441.2 %1.02.04.05.05.0

How much supervision did you receive from others (i.e., co-supervisor, other members of the research team) regarding the following?

a. Ethical approval

a. Ethical approvalNumber of responses
Very little 9 (37.5%)
Little 4 (16.7%)
Some4 (16.7%)
Considerable3 (12.5%)
A great deal 4 (16.7%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
a. Ethical approval2.51.560.3 %1.01.02.04.05.0

b. Time planning and management

b. Time planning and managementNumber of responses
Very little 8 (33.3%)
Little 3 (12.5%)
Some5 (20.8%)
Considerable4 (16.7%)
A great deal 4 (16.7%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
b. Time planning and management2.71.556.0 %1.01.03.04.05.0

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)Number of responses
Very little 3 (12.5%)
Little 6 (25.0%)
Some2 (8.3%)
Considerable7 (29.2%)
A great deal 6 (25.0%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
c. Formulating aim and research question(s)3.31.443.4 %1.02.04.04.55.0

d. Data management

d. Data managementNumber of responses
Very little 5 (20.8%)
Little 3 (12.5%)
Some6 (25.0%)
Considerable5 (20.8%)
A great deal 5 (20.8%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
d. Data management3.11.446.8 %1.02.03.04.05.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysisNumber of responses
Very little 3 (13.0%)
Little 4 (17.4%)
Some3 (13.0%)
Considerable7 (30.4%)
A great deal 6 (26.1%)
Total23 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
e. Statistical analysis3.41.441.5 %1.02.04.04.55.0

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of resultsNumber of responses
Very little 4 (16.7%)
Little 2 (8.3%)
Some7 (29.2%)
Considerable6 (25.0%)
A great deal 5 (20.8%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
f. Interpretation of results3.21.441.8 %1.02.53.04.05.0

g. Presentation of results

g. Presentation of results Number of responses
Very little 3 (12.0%)
Little 3 (12.0%)
Some6 (24.0%)
Considerable7 (28.0%)
A great deal 6 (24.0%)
Total25 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
g. Presentation of results 3.41.338.9 %1.03.04.04.05.0

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesisNumber of responses
Very little 6 (25.0%)
Little 2 (8.3%)
Some6 (25.0%)
Considerable4 (16.7%)
A great deal 6 (25.0%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
h. Writing up the thesis3.11.549.6 %1.01.53.04.55.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editingNumber of responses
Very little 6 (25.0%)
Little 1 (4.2%)
Some7 (29.2%)
Considerable5 (20.8%)
A great deal 5 (20.8%)
Total24 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
i. Language editing3.11.547.7 %1.01.53.04.05.0