VT26 Frontiers in Biomedicine: Research Project 1
Respondents: 46
Answer Count: 32
Answer Frequency: 69.57%
VT26 Frontiers in Biomedicine: Research Project 1
Respondents: 46
Answer Count: 32
Answer Frequency: 69.57%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 3 | 2 (6.2%) |
| 4 | 4 (12.5%) |
| 5 | 12 (37.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 13 (40.6%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 5.1 | 1.0 | 20.6 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 3 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 4 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5 | 5 (15.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 25 (78.1%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 5.6 | 0.9 | 16.1 % | 2.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 3 (9.4%) |
| 4 | 5 (15.6%) |
| 5 | 14 (43.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 10 (31.2%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 5.0 | 0.9 | 18.8 % | 3.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 3 | 3 (9.4%) |
| 4 | 10 (31.2%) |
| 5 | 8 (25.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 10 (31.2%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.7 | 1.1 | 23.6 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course built upon my knowledge from previous courses in the programme.
| The course built upon my knowledge from previous courses in the programme. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 3 | 2 (6.2%) |
| 4 | 7 (21.9%) |
| 5 | 10 (31.2%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 12 (37.5%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course built upon my knowledge from previous courses in the programme. | 4.9 | 1.1 | 21.8 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 4 | 3 (9.4%) |
| 5 | 12 (37.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 16 (50.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 5.3 | 0.8 | 14.7 % | 3.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 2 (6.5%) |
| 3 | 1 (3.2%) |
| 4 | 2 (6.5%) |
| 5 | 8 (25.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 18 (58.1%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 31 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 5.3 | 1.2 | 21.9 % | 2.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning.
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 3 | 1 (3.1%) |
| 4 | 7 (21.9%) |
| 5 | 8 (25.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 14 (43.8%) |
| Don't know | 1 (3.1%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | 5.1 | 1.1 | 21.0 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded?
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Far too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| Too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| Appropriate | 27 (84.4%) |
| Too high | 4 (12.5%) |
| Far too high | 1 (3.1%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | 3.2 | 0.5 | 14.8 % | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
The form of project presentation, written short summary, method reflection and informal group (around-the-table) discussion, is appropriate?
| The form of project presentation, written short summary, method reflection and informal group (around-the-table) discussion, is appropriate? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 2 (6.2%) |
| 4 | 4 (12.5%) |
| 5 | 12 (37.5%) |
6 Totally agree | 14 (43.8%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The form of project presentation, written short summary, method reflection and informal group (around-the-table) discussion, is appropriate? | 5.2 | 0.9 | 17.3 % | 3.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Overall, the peer-feedback exercises (reflection and annotation of formal mistakes) were useful for my learning.
| Overall, the peer-feedback exercises (reflection and annotation of formal mistakes) were useful for my learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 7 (21.9%) |
| 3 | 4 (12.5%) |
| 4 | 9 (28.1%) |
| 5 | 5 (15.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 7 (21.9%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 32 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall, the peer-feedback exercises (reflection and annotation of formal mistakes) were useful for my learning. | 4.0 | 1.4 | 35.9 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |