Course evaluation Degree project in Public heath sciences (4FH100) Spring 2023

Respondents: 42
Answer Count: 19
Answer Frequency: 45.24%

In which specialization are you registered?

In which specialization are you registered?	Number of responses
Public Health Epidemiology	8 (42.1%)
Health Promotion and Prevention	11 (57.9%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In which specialization are you registered?	1.6	0.5	32.1 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.0	2.0

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	6 (31.6%)
to a very large extent	13 (68.4%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.	4.7	0.5	10.2 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	6 (31.6%)
to a very large extent	13 (68.4%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.	4.7	0.5	10.2 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (5.3%)
to a large extent	7 (36.8%)
to a very large extent	11 (57.9%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.	4.5	0.6	13.5 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	5 (26.3%)
to a very large extent	14 (73.7%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).	4.7	0.5	9.6 %	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (5.3%)
to a large extent	4 (21.1%)
to a very large extent	14 (73.7%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.	4.7	0.6	12.4 %	3.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.

In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	3 (15.8%)
to a large extent	8 (42.1%)
to a very large extent	8 (42.1%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.	4.3	0.7	17.2 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.

My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (5.3%)
to a large extent	4 (21.1%)
to a very large extent	14 (73.7%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My ability to communicate around the subject, both orally and in writing has increased during the course.	4.7	0.6	12.4 %	3.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

There was a good atmosphere during the course.

There was a good atmosphere during the course.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (5.3%)
to a large extent	5 (26.3%)
to a very large extent	13 (68.4%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
There was a good atmosphere during the course.	4.6	0.6	12.9 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.

I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (5.3%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	11 (57.9%)
to a very large extent	7 (36.8%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I have had enough time to reflect on what I have learned.	4.3	0.7	17.2 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.

The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	7 (36.8%)
to a very large extent	12 (63.2%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.	4.6	0.5	10.7 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.

The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.	Number of responses
to a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	3 (15.8%)
to a large extent	7 (36.8%)
to a very large extent	9 (47.4%)
Total	19 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.	4.3	0.7	17.4 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

6. I completed the following self-learning modules:

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure	Number of responses
YES	16 (88.9%)
NO	2 (11.1%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure	1.1	0.3	29.1 %	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	2.0

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question	Number of responses
YES	14 (77.8%)
NO	4 (22.2%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question	1.2	0.4	35.0 %	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	2.0

c. Module 3: Scientific writing

c. Module 3: Scientific writing	Number of responses
YES	8 (44.4%)
NO	10 (55.6%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
c. Module 3: Scientific writing	1.6	0.5	32.9 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.0	2.0

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background	Number of responses
YES	7 (41.2%)
NO	10 (58.8%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background	1.6	0.5	31.9 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.0	2.0

e. Module 5: Presenting results

e. Module 5: Presenting results	Number of responses
YES	8 (44.4%)
NO	10 (55.6%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
e. Module 5: Presenting results	1.6	0.5	32.9 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.0	2.0

7. The content of the self-learning modules was relevant and helped me develop skills to achieve the course’s intended learning outcomes

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (11.8%)
To some extent	2 (11.8%)
To a large extent	6 (35.3%)
To a very large extent	5 (29.4%)
Do not know/Non applicable	2 (11.8%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure	4.2	1.2	28.4 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	6.0

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (5.9%)
To some extent	3 (17.6%)
To a large extent	2 (11.8%)
To a very large extent	7 (41.2%)
Do not know/Non applicable	4 (23.5%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question	4.6	1.2	26.8 %	2.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	6.0

c. Module 3: Scientific writing

c. Module 3: Scientific writing	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (11.8%)
To some extent	1 (5.9%)
To a large extent	1 (5.9%)
To a very large extent	5 (29.4%)
Do not know/Non applicable	8 (47.1%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
c. Module 3: Scientific writing	4.9	1.4	28.1 %	2.0	5.0	5.0	6.0	6.0

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (5.9%)
To a large extent	4 (23.5%)
To a very large extent	3 (17.6%)
Do not know/Non applicable	9 (52.9%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background	5.2	1.0	19.6 %	3.0	4.0	6.0	6.0	6.0

e. Module 5: Presenting results

e. Module 5: Presenting results	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (5.9%)
To a large extent	2 (11.8%)
To a very large extent	6 (35.3%)
Do not know/Non applicable	8 (47.1%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
e. Module 5: Presenting results	5.2	0.9	17.3 %	3.0	5.0	5.0	6.0	6.0

2. I am overall satisfied with the support received from my main supervisor throughout the Degree project course.

	Number of responses
Very little	0 (0.0%)
Little	0 (0.0%)
Some	0 (0.0%)
Considerable	7 (41.2%)
A great deal	10 (58.8%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
	4.6	0.5	11.1 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

3. How much supervision did you need/expect from your main supervisor regarding the following?

a. Ethical approval

a. Ethical approval	Number of responses
Very little	6 (35.3%)
Little	5 (29.4%)
Some	2 (11.8%)
Considerable	3 (17.6%)
A great deal	1 (5.9%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
a. Ethical approval	2.3	1.3	57.2 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	5.0

b. Time planning and management

b. Time planning and management	Number of responses
Very little	7 (38.9%)
Little	3 (16.7%)
Some	2 (11.1%)
Considerable	4 (22.2%)
A great deal	2 (11.1%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
b. Time planning and management	2.5	1.5	60.2 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	4.0	5.0

c. Formulating aim and research question

c. Formulating aim and research question	Number of responses
Very little	2 (11.1%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	6 (33.3%)
Considerable	4 (22.2%)
A great deal	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
c. Formulating aim and research question	3.5	1.3	37.0 %	1.0	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0

d. Data management

d. Data management	Number of responses
Very little	4 (22.2%)
Little	2 (11.1%)
Some	7 (38.9%)
Considerable	1 (5.6%)
A great deal	4 (22.2%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
d. Data management	2.9	1.4	48.7 %	1.0	2.0	3.0	3.5	5.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysis	Number of responses
Very little	1 (5.6%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	6 (33.3%)
Considerable	4 (22.2%)
A great deal	6 (33.3%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
e. Statistical analysis	3.7	1.2	31.7 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of results	Number of responses
Very little	0 (0.0%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	7 (38.9%)
Considerable	8 (44.4%)
A great deal	2 (11.1%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
f. Interpretation of results	3.6	0.8	21.5 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

g. Presentation of results

g. Presentation of results	Number of responses
Very little	0 (0.0%)
Little	4 (22.2%)
Some	4 (22.2%)
Considerable	9 (50.0%)
A great deal	1 (5.6%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
g. Presentation of results	3.4	0.9	27.0 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesis	Number of responses
Very little	2 (11.1%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	5 (27.8%)
Considerable	5 (27.8%)
A great deal	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
h. Writing up the thesis	3.6	1.3	36.4 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editing	Number of responses
Very little	5 (27.8%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	6 (33.3%)
Considerable	2 (11.1%)
A great deal	4 (22.2%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
i. Language editing	2.9	1.5	51.4 %	1.0	1.5	3.0	4.0	5.0

4. How much supervision did you receive from your main supervisor regarding the following?

a. Literature review

a. Literature review	Number of responses
Very little	4 (22.2%)
Little	5 (27.8%)
Some	2 (11.1%)
Considerable	3 (16.7%)
A great deal	4 (22.2%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
a. Literature review	2.9	1.5	52.9 %	1.0	2.0	2.5	4.0	5.0

b. Ethical approval

b. Ethical approval	Number of responses
Very little	7 (41.2%)
Little	2 (11.8%)
Some	2 (11.8%)
Considerable	4 (23.5%)
A great deal	2 (11.8%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
b. Ethical approval	2.5	1.5	61.1 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	4.0	5.0

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)	Number of responses
Very little	3 (16.7%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	5 (27.8%)
Considerable	5 (27.8%)
A great deal	4 (22.2%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
c. Formulating aim and research question(s)	3.3	1.4	41.2 %	1.0	3.0	3.5	4.0	5.0

d. Data management

d. Data management	Number of responses
Very little	5 (27.8%)
Little	3 (16.7%)
Some	4 (22.2%)
Considerable	3 (16.7%)
A great deal	3 (16.7%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
d. Data management	2.8	1.5	53.2 %	1.0	1.5	3.0	4.0	5.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysis	Number of responses
Very little	2 (11.1%)
Little	3 (16.7%)
Some	3 (16.7%)
Considerable	5 (27.8%)
A great deal	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
e. Statistical analysis	3.4	1.4	40.1 %	1.0	2.5	4.0	4.5	5.0

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of results	Number of responses
Very little	1 (5.6%)
Little	2 (11.1%)
Some	3 (16.7%)
Considerable	7 (38.9%)
A great deal	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
f. Interpretation of results	3.7	1.2	31.7 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

g. Presentation of results

g. Presentation of results	Number of responses
Very little	1 (5.9%)
Little	6 (35.3%)
Some	3 (17.6%)
Considerable	4 (23.5%)
A great deal	3 (17.6%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
g. Presentation of results	3.1	1.3	40.7 %	1.0	2.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesis	Number of responses
Very little	4 (22.2%)
Little	2 (11.1%)
Some	4 (22.2%)
Considerable	3 (16.7%)
A great deal	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
h. Writing up the thesis	3.2	1.5	48.7 %	1.0	2.0	3.0	4.5	5.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editing	Number of responses
Very little	4 (22.2%)
Little	4 (22.2%)
Some	4 (22.2%)
Considerable	1 (5.6%)
A great deal	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
i. Language editing	2.9	1.6	52.7 %	1.0	2.0	3.0	4.5	5.0

5. How much supervision did you receive from others (i.e., co-supervisor, other members of the research team) regarding the following?

a. Ethical approval

a. Ethical approval	Number of responses
Very little	8 (47.1%)
Little	3 (17.6%)
Some	3 (17.6%)
Considerable	0 (0.0%)
A great deal	3 (17.6%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
a. Ethical approval	2.2	1.5	68.1 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	5.0

b. Time planning and management

b. Time planning and management	Number of responses
Very little	11 (61.1%)
Little	2 (11.1%)
Some	0 (0.0%)
Considerable	2 (11.1%)
A great deal	3 (16.7%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
b. Time planning and management	2.1	1.6	77.7 %	1.0	1.0	1.0	3.0	5.0

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)	Number of responses
Very little	7 (38.9%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	5 (27.8%)
Considerable	2 (11.1%)
A great deal	3 (16.7%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
c. Formulating aim and research question(s)	2.6	1.5	58.9 %	1.0	1.0	3.0	3.5	5.0

d. Data management

d. Data management	Number of responses
Very little	6 (33.3%)
Little	2 (11.1%)
Some	7 (38.9%)
Considerable	0 (0.0%)
A great deal	3 (16.7%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
d. Data management	2.6	1.4	55.7 %	1.0	1.0	3.0	3.0	5.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysis	Number of responses
Very little	1 (5.6%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	4 (22.2%)
Considerable	6 (33.3%)
A great deal	6 (33.3%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
e. Statistical analysis	3.8	1.2	30.0 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of results	Number of responses
Very little	2 (11.1%)
Little	0 (0.0%)
Some	5 (27.8%)
Considerable	8 (44.4%)
A great deal	3 (16.7%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
f. Interpretation of results	3.6	1.1	32.3 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

g. Presentation of results

g. Presentation of results	Number of responses
Very little	6 (33.3%)
Little	1 (5.6%)
Some	3 (16.7%)
Considerable	5 (27.8%)
A great deal	3 (16.7%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
g. Presentation of results	2.9	1.6	54.3 %	1.0	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesis	Number of responses
Very little	5 (29.4%)
Little	2 (11.8%)
Some	3 (17.6%)
Considerable	3 (17.6%)
A great deal	4 (23.5%)
Total	17 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
h. Writing up the thesis	2.9	1.6	54.4 %	1.0	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editing	Number of responses
Very little	7 (38.9%)
Little	3 (16.7%)
Some	5 (27.8%)
Considerable	1 (5.6%)
A great deal	2 (11.1%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
i. Language editing	2.3	1.4	58.8 %	1.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	5.0

6. Did you attend research group meetings during the degree project?

6. Did you attend research group meetings during the degree project?	Number of responses
Yes	14 (77.8%)
No	4 (22.2%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
6. Did you attend research group meetings during the degree project?	1.2	0.4	35.0 %	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	2.0

7. Did you present your project and results to the research group?

7. Did you present your project and results to the research group?	Number of responses
Yes	13 (72.2%)
No	5 (27.8%)
Total	18 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
7. Did you present your project and results to the research group?	1.3	0.5	36.1 %	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.5	2.0