2LK111 Part Reproduction Solna, Spring 2023

Respondents: 12
Answer Count: 10
Answer Frequency: 83.33%

My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.

My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	3 (30.0%)
To a large extent	5 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.	3.9	0.7	18.9 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	4.0	5.0

I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.

I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	2 (20.0%)
To a large extent	8 (80.0%)
To a very large extent	0 (0.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.	3.8	0.4	11.1 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0

The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.

The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	8 (80.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own learning were reasonable.	4.2	0.4	10.0 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.

The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	7 (70.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.	4.1	0.6	13.8 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.

I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent	6 (60.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.	4.5	0.7	15.7 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.

The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	5 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	4 (40.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.	4.3	0.7	15.7 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.

I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (20.0%)
To some extent	2 (20.0%)
To a large extent	4 (40.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.	3.6	1.1	29.9 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.

The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	2 (20.0%)
To a large extent	3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent	5 (50.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.	4.3	0.8	19.1 %	3.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.

The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	3 (30.0%)
To a large extent	3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.	4.3	1.2	27.0 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	5.0	6.0

Do you consider that your learning effort during Part Reproduction corresponded to full-time studies?

Do you consider that your learning effort during Part Reproduction corresponded to full-time studies?	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent	6 (60.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Do you consider that your learning effort during Part Reproduction corresponded to full-time studies?	4.5	0.7	15.7 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

The quiz was relevant to the course´s learning objectives.

The quiz was relevant to the course´s learning objectives.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	6 (60.0%)
To a very large extent	4 (40.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The quiz was relevant to the course´s learning objectives.	4.4	0.5	11.7 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.

I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (20.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent	5 (50.0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I believe that the majority of the doctors/clinical instructors have treated me with respect.	4.1	1.2	29.2 %	2.0	4.0	4.5	5.0	5.0

The seminars/practical training were a support in my learning process during Part Reproduction?

Seminar Complications of pregnancy

Seminar Complications of pregnancy	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	3 (30.0%)
to a large extent	7 (70.0%)
to a very large extent	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Complications of pregnancy	3.7	0.5	13.1 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	4.0	4.0

Seminar Mixed cases

Seminar Mixed cases	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	1 (10.0%)
to some extent	2 (20.0%)
to a large extent	4 (40.0%)
to a very large extent	3 (30.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Mixed cases	3.9	1.0	25.5 %	2.0	3.5	4.0	4.5	5.0

Seminar Bleeding during pregnancy

Seminar Bleeding during pregnancy	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (10.0%)
to a large extent	5 (50.0%)
to a very large extent	4 (40.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Bleeding during pregnancy	4.3	0.7	15.7 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Seminar Abnormal uterine bleeding

Seminar Abnormal uterine bleeding	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	1 (10.0%)
to a large extent	6 (60.0%)
to a very large extent	3 (30.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Abnormal uterine bleeding	4.2	0.6	15.1 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

Seminar Pelvic masses

Seminar Pelvic masses	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	0 (0.0%)
to some extent	3 (30.0%)
to a large extent	5 (50.0%)
to a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Seminar Pelvic masses	3.9	0.7	18.9 %	3.0	3.5	4.0	4.0	5.0

Practical training

Practical training	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
to a small extent	2 (20.0%)
to some extent	0 (0.0%)
to a large extent	5 (50.0%)
to a very large extent	3 (30.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Practical training	3.9	1.1	28.2 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

Questions about clinical rotation

During clinical rotation, I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.

During clinical rotation, I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	1 (10.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	5 (50.0%)
To a very large extent	3 (30.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation, I have practiced/discussed evidence-based work methods.	4.0	0.9	23.6 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

During clinical rotation, the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).

During clinical rotation, the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	1 (10.0%)
To a very large extent	9 (90.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation, the physical resources I needed were available (e.g. computer, conversation room, changing room, lunch room).	4.9	0.3	6.5 %	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

During clinical rotation, I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.

During clinical rotation, I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	2 (20.0%)
To some extent	0 (0.0%)
To a large extent	1 (10.0%)
To a very large extent	7 (70.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
During clinical rotation, I have practiced safe work methods to avoid risks and accidents.	4.3	1.3	29.1 %	2.0	4.5	5.0	5.0	5.0

The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.

The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent	6 (60.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.	4.5	0.7	15.7 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

I took part in relevant activities during my clinical rotation.

I took part in relevant activities during my clinical rotation.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (10.0%)
To a large extent	6 (60.0%)
To a very large extent	2 (20.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	1 (10.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I took part in relevant activities during my clinical rotation.	4.1	0.6	14.6 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

I was appointed a supervisor during my clinical rotation.

I was appointed a supervisor during my clinical rotation.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	0 (0.0%)
To a small extent	0 (0.0%)
To some extent	1 (11.1%)
To a large extent	5 (55.6%)
To a very large extent	3 (33.3%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
I was appointed a supervisor during my clinical rotation.	4.2	0.7	15.8 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the rotation.

My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the rotation.	Number of responses
To a very small extent	1 (10.0%)
To a small extent	1 (10.0%)
To some extent	2 (20.0%)
To a large extent	2 (20.0%)
To a very large extent	4 (40.0%)
Don't know/Not applicable	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the rotation.	3.7	1.4	38.3 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?

Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?	Number of responses
No	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at one to three occasions	5 (50.0%)
Yes, at four to six occasions	3 (30.0%)
Yes, at seven to ten occasions	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at more than ten occasions	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?	2.9	1.2	41.3 %	2.0	2.0	2.5	3.0	5.0

Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?

Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?	Number of responses
No	0 (0.0%)
Yes, at one to three occasions	7 (70.0%)
Yes, at four to six occasions	1 (10.0%)
Yes, at seven to ten occasions	2 (20.0%)
Yes, at more than ten occasions	0 (0.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?	2.5	0.8	34.0 %	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.5	4.0

How do you value the clinical rotation during Part Reproduction?

Clinic for gynecologic endocrinology

Clinic for gynecologic endocrinology	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (22.2%)
good	3 (33.3%)
very good	4 (44.4%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Clinic for gynecologic endocrinology	4.2	0.8	19.7 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Clinic for hereditary cancer

Clinic for hereditary cancer	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (16.7%)
neither bad nor good	1 (16.7%)
good	2 (33.3%)
very good	2 (33.3%)
Total	6 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Clinic for hereditary cancer	3.8	1.2	30.5 %	2.0	3.5	4.0	4.5	5.0

Gynecology outpatient clinic Danderyd Hospital

Gynecology outpatient clinic Danderyd Hospital	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	2 (22.2%)
neither bad nor good	3 (33.3%)
good	2 (22.2%)
very good	2 (22.2%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Gynecology outpatient clinic Danderyd Hospital	3.4	1.1	32.8 %	2.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

Gynecology emergency room Danderyd Hospital

Gynecology emergency room Danderyd Hospital	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (11.1%)
neither bad nor good	3 (33.3%)
good	1 (11.1%)
very good	4 (44.4%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Gynecology emergency room Danderyd Hospital	3.9	1.2	30.0 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Södertälje Hospital

Södertälje Hospital	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (20.0%)
good	1 (20.0%)
very good	2 (40.0%)
Total	5 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Södertälje Hospital	3.8	1.3	34.3 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital

Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (25.0%)
good	1 (25.0%)
very good	2 (50.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital	4.2	1.0	22.5 %	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0	5.0

Gynecologic oncology/Theme cancer

Gynecologic oncology/Theme cancer	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	3 (33.3%)
very good	6 (66.7%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Gynecologic oncology/Theme cancer	4.7	0.5	10.7 %	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Clinical research in reproductive health (WHO-centre)

Clinical research in reproductive health (WHO-centre)	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (25.0%)
good	1 (25.0%)
very good	2 (50.0%)
Total	4 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Clinical research in reproductive health (WHO-centre)	4.2	1.0	22.5 %	3.0	3.5	4.5	5.0	5.0

Student outpatient clinic

Student outpatient clinic	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (11.1%)
good	2 (22.2%)
very good	6 (66.7%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Student outpatient clinic	4.6	0.7	15.9 %	3.0	4.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Delivery ward with doctor

Delivery ward with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (10.0%)
neither bad nor good	2 (20.0%)
good	5 (50.0%)
very good	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Delivery ward with doctor	3.8	0.9	24.2 %	2.0	3.5	4.0	4.0	5.0

Emergency obstetric care unit with doctor

Emergency obstetric care unit with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	2 (20.0%)
neither bad nor good	4 (40.0%)
good	2 (20.0%)
very good	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Emergency obstetric care unit with doctor	3.4	1.1	31.6 %	2.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	5.0

Antenatal ward with doctor

Antenatal ward with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	5 (50.0%)
neither bad nor good	3 (30.0%)
good	1 (10.0%)
very good	1 (10.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Antenatal ward with doctor	2.8	1.0	36.9 %	2.0	2.0	2.5	3.0	5.0

Postnatal ward with doctor

Postnatal ward with doctor	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	1 (11.1%)
good	5 (55.6%)
very good	3 (33.3%)
Total	9 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Postnatal ward with doctor	4.2	0.7	15.8 %	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0	5.0

Delivery ward with midwife

Delivery ward with midwife	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (10.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	6 (60.0%)
very good	3 (30.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Delivery ward with midwife	4.1	0.9	21.4 %	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	5.0

Ultrasound

Ultrasound	Number of responses
Very bad	1 (10.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	3 (30.0%)
good	4 (40.0%)
very good	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Ultrasound	3.6	1.2	32.6 %	1.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Midwifery clinic Sundbyberg

Midwifery clinic Sundbyberg	Number of responses
Very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	1 (14.3%)
neither bad nor good	1 (14.3%)
good	3 (42.9%)
very good	2 (28.6%)
Total	7 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Midwifery clinic Sundbyberg	3.9	1.1	27.7 %	2.0	3.5	4.0	4.5	5.0

Have you, during any clinical rotation in the course, been trained on how to:

Have you, during any clinical rotation in the course, been trained on how to:	Number of responses
Prescribe medication	0 (0.0%)
Prescribe intravenous infusion	1 (50.0%)
Prescribe medication (in a prescription module in Take Care)	0 (0.0%)
Provide oral medication orders to nurses	2 (100.0%)
Total	3 (150.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
Have you, during any clinical rotation in the course, been trained on how to:	3.3	1.2	34.6 %	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	4.0

What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?

What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?	Number of responses
very bad	0 (0.0%)
bad	0 (0.0%)
neither bad nor good	0 (0.0%)
good	8 (80.0%)
very good	2 (20.0%)
Total	10 (100.0%)

	Mean	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Min	Lower Quartile	Median	Upper Quartile	Max
What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?	4.2	0.4	10.0 %	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	5.0

Thank you for your feedback!