2996_1 Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Surgery (mice and rats) HT23 - Full

Respondents: 14
Answer Count: 10
Answer Frequency: 71.43%


 

 1. The content of the course was clearly presented in the syllabus.

The content of the course was clearly presented in the syllabus.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent6 (60.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The content of the course was clearly presented in the syllabus.4.50.715.7 %3.04.05.05.05.0

 2. I was highly motivated to learn the content of the course.

I was highly motivated to learn the content of the course. Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent3 (30.0%)
To a large extent1 (10.0%)
To a very large extent6 (60.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
I was highly motivated to learn the content of the course. 4.30.922.1 %3.03.55.05.05.0

 3. The intended learning outcomes of the course were clearly explained.

The intended learning outcomes of the course were clearly explained.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent2 (20.0%)
To a large extent5 (50.0%)
To a very large extent3 (30.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The intended learning outcomes of the course were clearly explained.4.10.718.0 %3.04.04.04.55.0

 4. The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes.

The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes. Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent6 (60.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes. 4.50.715.7 %3.04.05.05.05.0

 5. The teaching and learning activities facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes.

The teaching and learning activities facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent1 (10.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent2 (20.0%)
To a very large extent6 (60.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The teaching and learning activities facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes.4.31.124.6 %2.04.05.05.05.0

 6. During the course, I have received sufficient feedback from the teachers and/or the other 
course participants, when needed.

During the course, I have received sufficient feedback from the teachers and/or the other course participants, when needed.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent2 (20.0%)
To a large extent3 (30.0%)
To a very large extent5 (50.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
During the course, I have received sufficient feedback from the teachers and/or the other course participants, when needed. 4.30.819.1 %3.04.04.55.05.0

 7. I have actively engaged in the course.

I have actively engaged in the course.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent1 (10.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent4 (40.0%)
To a very large extent4 (40.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
I have actively engaged in the course.4.11.024.3 %2.04.04.05.05.0

 8. I had sufficient prior knowledge to fully participate in the course.

I had sufficient prior knowledge to fully participate in the course. Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent4 (40.0%)
To a large extent4 (40.0%)
To a very large extent2 (20.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
I had sufficient prior knowledge to fully participate in the course. 3.80.820.8 %3.03.04.04.05.0

 9. During the course, the teachers have been open to students’ ideas and opinions about the course.

During the course, the teachers have been open to students’ ideas and opinions about the course.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent5 (50.0%)
To a very large extent4 (40.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
During the course, the teachers have been open to students’ ideas and opinions about the course.4.30.715.7 %3.04.04.05.05.0

 10. During the course, I have developed valuable expertise/skills.

During the course, I have developed valuable expertise/skills.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent4 (40.0%)
To a very large extent5 (50.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
During the course, I have developed valuable expertise/skills.4.40.715.9 %3.04.04.55.05.0

 11. During the course, I have developed my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings. (If the question is not relevant to this course, select the response option ”Not applicable”)

During the course, I have developed my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings. (If the question is not relevant to this course, select the response option ”Not applicable”)Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent0 (0.0%)
To a large extent1 (10.0%)
To a very large extent4 (40.0%)
Not applicable5 (50.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
During the course, I have developed my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings. (If the question is not relevant to this course, select the response option ”Not applicable”)4.80.49.3 %4.05.05.05.05.0

 12. The examination adequately assessed the achievement of the intended learning outcomes.

The examination adequately assessed the achievement of the intended learning outcomes.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent1 (10.0%)
To some extent1 (10.0%)
To a large extent6 (60.0%)
To a very large extent2 (20.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
The examination adequately assessed the achievement of the intended learning outcomes.3.90.922.5 %2.04.04.04.05.0

 13. I have achieved the intended learning outcomes of the course.

I have achieved the intended learning outcomes of the course. Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent0 (0.0%)
To some extent2 (20.0%)
To a large extent5 (50.0%)
To a very large extent3 (30.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
I have achieved the intended learning outcomes of the course. 4.10.718.0 %3.04.04.04.55.0

 14. From my perspective the workload was reasonable in relation to the number of credits.

From my perspective the workload was reasonable in relation to the number of credits.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent1 (10.0%)
To some extent0 (0.0%)
To a large extent4 (40.0%)
To a very large extent5 (50.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
From my perspective the workload was reasonable in relation to the number of credits.4.30.922.1 %2.04.04.55.05.0

 15. This course has fulfilled my expectations of a high quality course.

This course has fulfilled my expectations of a high quality course.Number of responses
To a very small extent0 (0.0%)
To a small extent1 (10.0%)
To some extent0 (0.0%)
To a large extent4 (40.0%)
To a very large extent5 (50.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
This course has fulfilled my expectations of a high quality course.4.30.922.1 %2.04.04.55.05.0

 16. Were there any parts of the course that were excellent? If so, please specify which parts and in what way.

Were there any parts of the course that were excellent? If so, please specify which parts and in what way.
The hands-on session in the last second is perfect. Sometimes practice is much better than only reading the study materials.
I would want more practical moments. I found Rafaels lessons very helpful.
The hands on training was really good and very well organised! I also really liked the online zoom lectures which I found very interactive and practical!
Thank you for the great lunch on Wednesday!
I really liked the lectures from Paul Flecknell.
The practical part was also very well done: since I did not have so much prior knowledge I was a bit nervous before the course but I was very happy that so many helpful hands were present during the practical session for guidance and support and I never felt stressed or pressured to do something I was not comfortable.
I thought the practical part was a very good part of the course. this is where we were able to put what we learned into practice. I also appreciated the hybrid format with in person, zoom, and e-learning modules.
The workshop assistants were very kind and helpful despite the fact that it was stressful for some of the students. Thanks for that! The e-learning modules were very nice and pleasant to learn from. Paul Flecknell was amazing to have as a teacher! Rafael Frias was also a very good lecturer.

 17. Do you have any recommendations as to how the course could be improved? If so, please specify which parts and how.

Do you have any recommendations as to how the course could be improved? If so, please specify which parts and how.
As educators, we need to recognize that online courses are not suitable for everyone. Some people prefer face-to-face interactions and find online courses to be less engaging. Therefore, we should consider decreasing the length of webinars to keep learners' attention and interest. Additionally, we need to explore more interactive methods of teaching to enhance the learning experience. Ultimately, we must remember that the goal is to provide quality education in a way that is accessible for all, and that may mean finding alternative methods of delivery.
The web course takes much longer time than provided. I spent more time than scheduled and still had go do them quickly which was not good for learning.
Some questions during the exam were a bit tricky in the way they were formulated (so the wording), where it could be both correct and false depending on how one interprets it...

Also a few questions were not really mentioned during the lectures, so it was hard to answer even though we could use our study material.
I was really hoping for more practical time. I think one day is not enough to practice everything we learned. I think that that practical day was great but i think one more day where we kind of go through a full surgery ourselves with a mouse anesthetized would be really useful. I think it would be fun to have a second practical day where you choose 2 common surgeries (osmotic pump and something else for example) that we can do. In this way, we are given a mouse/rat, we decide what anesthetic/analgesia to give, we put the mouse to sleep, perform the surgery while checking the signs, and then suture things back up.
The exam could be moved to another time slot since 4-5 pm might be late for some students (for example those who have kids). There should be more time in the schedule allocated for the e-leanings. I needed more time than what was allocated.

 18. Would you recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education? (Answer only if you are a doctoral student, otherwise select the response option ”Not applicable”)

Would you recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education? (Answer only if you are a doctoral student, otherwise select the response option ”Not applicable”)Number of responses
 Yes7 (70.0%)
No1 (10.0%)
Not applicable2 (20.0%)
Total10 (100.0%)
 MeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationMinLower QuartileMedianUpper QuartileMax
Would you recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education? (Answer only if you are a doctoral student, otherwise select the response option ”Not applicable”)1.10.431.4 %1.01.01.01.02.0
Comparison with all doctoral courses evaluated at KI during 2021 ("Aggregated" includes all evaluations for that calendar year)
 Course meanAggregated
mean
Difference of meansCourse medianAggregated medianCourse P25Aggregated
P25
Course P75Aggregated
P75

Q1 Course content

4.504.330.175.004.004.004.005.005.00

Q2 Motivation

4.304.34-0.045.004.003.504.005.005.00

Q3 Clear Intended learning outcomes

4.104.26-0.164.004.004.004.004.505.00

Q4 Course design

4.504.190.315.004.004.004.005.005.00

Q5 Teaching and learning activities

4.304.200.105.004.004.004.005.005.00

Q6 Feedback

4.303.980.324.504.004.003.005.005.00

Q7 Engagement

4.104.25-0.154.004.004.004.005.005.00

Q8 Prior knowledge

3.803.98-0.184.004.003.003.004.005.00

Q9 Student input

4.304.40-0.104.005.004.004.005.005.00

Q10 Expertise/skills

4.404.110.294.504.004.004.005.005.00

Q11 Critical analysis

4.804.080.725.004.005.004.005.005.00

Q12 Examination

3.904.16-0.264.004.004.004.004.005.00

Q13 Achieved intended learning outcomes

4.104.13-0.034.004.004.004.004.505.00

Q14 Workload

4.304.010.294.504.004.004.005.005.00

Q15 Fulfilled expectations

4.304.210.094.504.004.004.005.005.00