4NT015 Monitoring of non-communicable diseases, large scale data collection, analysis and data visualizations VT2026
Respondents: 31
Answer Count: 24
Answer Frequency: 77.42%
4NT015 Monitoring of non-communicable diseases, large scale data collection, analysis and data visualizations VT2026
Respondents: 31
Answer Count: 24
Answer Frequency: 77.42%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 5 (20.8%) |
| 4 | 8 (33.3%) |
| 5 | 3 (12.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 8 (33.3%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 4.6 | 1.2 | 25.7 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (4.2%) |
| 3 | 1 (4.2%) |
| 4 | 4 (16.7%) |
| 5 | 5 (20.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 13 (54.2%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 5.2 | 1.1 | 21.9 % | 2.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (4.2%) |
| 2 | 2 (8.3%) |
| 3 | 4 (16.7%) |
| 4 | 8 (33.3%) |
| 5 | 2 (8.3%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 7 (29.2%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 4.2 | 1.5 | 35.0 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course was well organized.
| The course was well organized. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 4 (16.7%) |
| 3 | 6 (25.0%) |
| 4 | 4 (16.7%) |
| 5 | 1 (4.2%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 9 (37.5%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was well organized. | 4.2 | 1.6 | 37.7 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
When/If I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/If I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 3 (12.5%) |
| 3 | 3 (12.5%) |
| 4 | 2 (8.3%) |
| 5 | 3 (12.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 13 (54.2%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/If I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 4.8 | 1.5 | 31.5 % | 2.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The feedback (for example peer-feedback, feedback from teacher) that I have received has been valuable for my development and learning.
| The feedback (for example peer-feedback, feedback from teacher) that I have received has been valuable for my development and learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 2 (8.3%) |
| 3 | 4 (16.7%) |
| 4 | 3 (12.5%) |
| 5 | 4 (16.7%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 9 (37.5%) |
| Don't know | 2 (8.3%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback (for example peer-feedback, feedback from teacher) that I have received has been valuable for my development and learning. | 4.6 | 1.4 | 30.9 % | 2.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The workload was reasonable in relation to the course's credits.
| The workload was reasonable in relation to the course's credits. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 2 (8.3%) |
| 4 | 3 (12.5%) |
| 5 | 7 (29.2%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 12 (50.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 24 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The workload was reasonable in relation to the course's credits. | 5.2 | 1.0 | 18.8 % | 3.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The examination was an opportunity for learning.
| The examination was an opportunity for learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 3 (13.6%) |
| 3 | 3 (13.6%) |
| 4 | 2 (9.1%) |
| 5 | 3 (13.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 11 (50.0%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 22 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was an opportunity for learning. | 4.7 | 1.5 | 32.8 % | 2.0 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |