VT25 Biochemistry
Respondents: 64
Answer Count: 49
Answer Frequency: 76.56%
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to some extent | 5 (10.2%) |
| to a large extent | 25 (51.0%) |
| to a very large extent | 15 (30.6%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course. | 4.0 | 1.0 | 24.5 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to some extent | 10 (20.4%) |
| to a large extent | 28 (57.1%) |
| to a very large extent | 7 (14.3%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course. | 3.7 | 0.9 | 24.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 8 (16.3%) |
| to a large extent | 22 (44.9%) |
| to a very large extent | 18 (36.7%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations. | 4.1 | 0.8 | 20.3 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to a small extent | 5 (10.2%) |
| to some extent | 7 (14.3%) |
| to a large extent | 20 (40.8%) |
| to a very large extent | 15 (30.6%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information). | 3.8 | 1.1 | 28.8 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.0%) |
| to a small extent | 4 (8.2%) |
| to some extent | 14 (28.6%) |
| to a large extent | 15 (30.6%) |
| to a very large extent | 15 (30.6%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content. | 3.8 | 1.0 | 27.4 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded?
| To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| To a very small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| To a small extent | 6 (12.2%) |
| To some extent | 12 (24.5%) |
| To a large extent | 22 (44.9%) |
| To a very large extent | 7 (14.3%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To what extent do you feel that the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course/number of credits awarded? | 3.5 | 1.0 | 29.0 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to some extent | 10 (20.4%) |
| to a large extent | 28 (57.1%) |
| to a very large extent | 7 (14.3%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 3.7 | 0.9 | 24.3 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.0%) |
| to a small extent | 2 (4.1%) |
| to some extent | 8 (16.3%) |
| to a large extent | 26 (53.1%) |
| to a very large extent | 12 (24.5%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 3.9 | 0.9 | 22.2 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
I took responsibility for my own learning during this course.
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.0%) |
| to a small extent | 0 (0.0%) |
| to some extent | 6 (12.2%) |
| to a large extent | 20 (40.8%) |
| to a very large extent | 22 (44.9%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I took responsibility for my own learning during this course. | 4.3 | 0.8 | 19.6 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 1 (2.0%) |
| to a small extent | 6 (12.2%) |
| to some extent | 11 (22.4%) |
| to a large extent | 15 (30.6%) |
| to a very large extent | 16 (32.7%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 3.8 | 1.1 | 28.9 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning.
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| to a very small extent | 3 (6.1%) |
| to a small extent | 4 (8.2%) |
| to some extent | 26 (53.1%) |
| to a large extent | 9 (18.4%) |
| to a very large extent | 7 (14.3%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback that I have received has been important for my development and learning. | 3.3 | 1.0 | 31.1 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
What is your overall opinion of the course?
| What is your overall opinion of the course? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 2 (4.1%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 9 (18.4%) |
| good | 26 (53.1%) |
| very good | 12 (24.5%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is your overall opinion of the course? | 3.9 | 0.9 | 22.8 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
How do you rate the different lab exercises and project works?
Protein purification and characterisation lab
Protein purification and characterisation lab | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| OK | 9 (18.4%) |
| good | 14 (28.6%) |
| very good | 25 (51.0%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein purification and characterisation lab | 4.3 | 0.9 | 21.3 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Lipid Lab
| Lipid Lab | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 2 (4.1%) |
| poor | 3 (6.1%) |
| OK | 9 (18.4%) |
| good | 22 (44.9%) |
| very good | 13 (26.5%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid Lab | 3.8 | 1.0 | 26.8 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Insulin lab
| Insulin lab | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 2 (4.1%) |
| poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| OK | 3 (6.1%) |
| good | 20 (40.8%) |
| very good | 23 (46.9%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin lab | 4.2 | 1.0 | 22.8 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Project work Lipids
| Project work Lipids | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 3 (6.2%) |
| poor | 2 (4.2%) |
| OK | 11 (22.9%) |
| good | 17 (35.4%) |
| very good | 15 (31.2%) |
| Total | 48 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project work Lipids | 3.8 | 1.1 | 29.5 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Project work Metabolism in Health and Disease
| Project work Metabolism in Health and Disease | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| very poor | 5 (10.6%) |
| poor | 5 (10.6%) |
| OK | 16 (34.0%) |
| good | 9 (19.1%) |
| very good | 12 (25.5%) |
| Total | 47 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project work Metabolism in Health and Disease | 3.4 | 1.3 | 37.8 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
How was your experience of the Canvas course page? (structure, user-friendliness, content)
Structure
| Structure | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| Poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| Ok | 2 (4.1%) |
| Good | 17 (34.7%) |
| Very good | 29 (59.2%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | 4.5 | 0.8 | 17.1 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Content
| Content | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very poor | 1 (2.0%) |
| Poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| Ok | 4 (8.2%) |
| Good | 13 (26.5%) |
| Very good | 31 (63.3%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 4.5 | 0.8 | 18.3 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
User-friendliness
| User-friendliness | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Very poor | 2 (4.1%) |
| Poor | 0 (0.0%) |
| Ok | 3 (6.1%) |
| Good | 13 (26.5%) |
| Very good | 31 (63.3%) |
| Total | 49 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| User-friendliness | 4.4 | 0.9 | 21.1 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Did you use any generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly.
| Did you use any generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| No (or I am not aware of it). | 9 (18.4%) |
| Yes, to write (parts of) my lab report for me. | 1 (2.0%) |
| Yes, to improve (the language of) my lab report. | 15 (30.6%) |
| Yes, to prepare the PW presentation. | 15 (30.6%) |
| Yes, to improve my understanding of topics learnt in the course. | 39 (79.6%) |
| Total | 79 (161.2%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you use any generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tool(s) such as ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI etc. during the course? NB: the survey is anonymous!! So, it is guaranteed that your answer has no influence on lab report or course grading. Please answer honestly. | 3.9 | 1.3 | 33.9 % | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |