Genetics, genomics and functional genomics 1BI050 VT2026
Respondents: 67
Answer Count: 27
Answer Frequency: 40.30%
Genetics, genomics and functional genomics 1BI050 VT2026
Respondents: 67
Answer Count: 27
Answer Frequency: 40.30%
The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc.
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 3 (11.1%) |
| 4 | 9 (33.3%) |
| 5 | 8 (29.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 7 (25.9%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course was designed in a way that provided me with opportunities for active learning. For example: seminars with discussions, group work, projects, student presentations, role play, peer learning, practical exercises, laboratory work, workplace-based learning, etc. | 4.7 | 1.0 | 21.1 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 |
I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar).
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4 | 3 (11.1%) |
| 5 | 8 (29.6%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 16 (59.3%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I felt included and respected during the course. For example: I was comfortable collaborating with other students, speaking in front of the group, answering teachers' questions, and I was listened to (not interrupted, ridiculed, or similar). | 5.5 | 0.7 | 12.8 % | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course as a whole was good.
| The course as a whole was good. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.7%) |
| 3 | 5 (18.5%) |
| 4 | 5 (18.5%) |
| 5 | 9 (33.3%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 7 (25.9%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course as a whole was good. | 4.6 | 1.2 | 25.8 % | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 |
The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 3 (11.5%) |
| 4 | 7 (26.9%) |
| 5 | 8 (30.8%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 7 (26.9%) |
| Don't know | 1 (3.8%) |
| Total | 26 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course structure and methods used (e.g. lectures, exercises, seminars, assignments etc.) were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.8 | 1.0 | 21.3 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The course built upon my knowledge from previous courses in the programme.
| The course built upon my knowledge from previous courses in the programme. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (3.7%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 2 (7.4%) |
| 4 | 7 (25.9%) |
| 5 | 11 (40.7%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 6 (22.2%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course built upon my knowledge from previous courses in the programme. | 4.7 | 1.1 | 24.5 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 1 (3.7%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 1 (3.7%) |
| 4 | 8 (29.6%) |
| 5 | 10 (37.0%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 4 (14.8%) |
| Don't know | 3 (11.1%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes. | 4.6 | 1.1 | 24.0 % | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance.
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 1 (3.7%) |
| 4 | 6 (22.2%) |
| 5 | 5 (18.5%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 15 (55.6%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When/if I had questions or problems with the course content, I felt that I could turn to my teacher/supervisor for guidance. | 5.3 | 0.9 | 18.0 % | 3.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning.
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| 1 Totally disagree | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 4 (14.8%) |
| 4 | 5 (18.5%) |
| 5 | 9 (33.3%) |
| 6 Totally agree | 9 (33.3%) |
| Don't know | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The feedback I received from teachers and peers throughout the course supported my learning. | 4.9 | 1.1 | 21.9 % | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded?
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | Number of responses |
|---|---|
| Far too low | 0 (0.0%) |
| Too low | 1 (3.7%) |
| Appropriate | 25 (92.6%) |
| Too high | 1 (3.7%) |
| Far too high | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0%) |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How do you perceive the workload in this course in relation to the number of credits awarded? | 3.0 | 0.3 | 9.2 % | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |